Brain tumour diagnostics using a DNA methylation-based classifier as a diagnostic support tool

dc.contributor.authorPriesterbach-Ackley LP
dc.contributor.authorBoldt HB
dc.contributor.authorPetersen JK
dc.contributor.authorBervoets N
dc.contributor.authorScheie D
dc.contributor.authorUlhoi BP
dc.contributor.authorGardberg M
dc.contributor.authorBrannstrom T
dc.contributor.authorTorp SH
dc.contributor.authorAronica E
dc.contributor.authorKusters B
dc.contributor.authorden Dunnen WFA
dc.contributor.authorde Vos FYFL
dc.contributor.authorWesseling P
dc.contributor.authorde Leng WWJ
dc.contributor.authorKristensen BW
dc.contributor.organizationfi=biolääketieteen laitos|en=Institute of Biomedicine|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.77952289591
dc.converis.publication-id47227780
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/47227780
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T12:29:02Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T12:29:02Z
dc.description.abstract<div><b>Aims:</b> Methylation profiling (MP) is increasingly incorporated in the diagnostic process of central nervous system (CNS) tumours at our centres in The Netherlands and Scandinavia. We aimed to identify the benefits and challenges of MP as a support tool for CNS tumour diagnostics. <b>Methods:</b> About 502 CNS tumour samples were analysed using (850 k) MP. Profiles were matched with the DKFZ/Heidelberg CNS Tumour Classifier. For each case, the final pathological diagnosis was compared to the diagnosis before MP. <b>Results:</b> In 54.4% (273/502) of all analysed cases, the suggested methylation class (calibrated score >= 0.9) corresponded with the initial pathological diagnosis. The diagnosis of 24.5% of these cases (67/273) was more refined after incorporation of the MP result. In 9.8% of cases (49/502), the MP result led to a new diagnosis, resulting in an altered WHO grade in 71.4% of these cases (35/49). In 1% of cases (5/502), the suggested class based on MP was initially disregarded/interpreted as misleading, but in retrospect, the MP result predicted the right diagnosis for three of these cases. In six cases, the suggested class was interpreted as 'discrepant but noncontributory'. The remaining 33.7% of cases (169/502) had a calibrated score <0.9, including 7.8% (39/502) for which no class indication was given at all (calibrated score <0.3). <b>Conclusions:</b> MP is a powerful tool to confirm and fine-tune the pathological diagnosis of CNS tumours, and to avoid misdiagnoses. However, it is crucial to interpret the results in the context of clinical, radiological, histopathological and other molecular information.</div>
dc.format.pagerange478
dc.format.pagerange492
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2990
dc.identifier.jour-issn0305-1846
dc.identifier.olddbid176731
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/159825
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/32287
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042824799
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorGardberg, Maria
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3111 Biomedicineen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3111 Biolääketieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.1111/nan.12610
dc.relation.ispartofjournalNeuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
dc.relation.issue5
dc.relation.volume46
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/159825
dc.titleBrain tumour diagnostics using a DNA methylation-based classifier as a diagnostic support tool
dc.year.issued2020

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
nan.12610.pdf
Size:
1.56 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher´s pdf