Probiotics Support Resilience of the Oral Microbiota during Resolution after Experimental Gingivitis - A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial

dc.contributor.authorLundtorp Olsen C
dc.contributor.authorMassarenti L
dc.contributor.authorVendius VFD
dc.contributor.authorGürsoy UK
dc.contributor.authorVan Splunter A
dc.contributor.authorBikker FJ
dc.contributor.authorGürsoy M
dc.contributor.authorDamgaard C
dc.contributor.authorMarkvart M
dc.contributor.authorBelstrøm D
dc.contributor.organizationfi=hammaslääketieteen laitos|en=Institute of Dentistry|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.64787032594
dc.converis.publication-id182491265
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/182491265
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T00:41:34Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T00:41:34Z
dc.description.abstract<p>The present study aims to test whether probiotics protect against experimental gingivitis incited by 14 days of oral hygiene neglect and/or subsequently support the restoration of oral homeostasis. Eighty systemically and orally healthy participants refrained from oral hygiene procedures for 14 days, followed by 14 days with regular oral hygiene procedures. Additionally, participants consumed either probiotics (<em>n</em> = 40) or placebo (<em>n</em> = 40) throughout the trial. At baseline, day 14, and day 28, supragingival plaque score and bleeding-on-probing percentage (BOP %) were registered, and supragingival plaque and saliva samples were collected. The supragingival microbiota was characterized using 16S sequencing, and saliva samples were analyzed for levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and proteases. At day 28, the relative abundance of <em>Lautropia</em> (<em>p</em> = 0.014), <em>Prevotella</em> (<em>p</em> = 0.046), <em>Fusobacterium</em> (<em>p</em> = 0.033), and <em>Selenomonas</em> (<em>p</em> = 0.0078) genera were significantly higher in the placebo group compared to the probiotics group, while the relative abundance of <em>Rothia</em> (<em>p</em> = 0.047) species was associated with the probiotics group. <em>Streptococcus sanguinis</em> was associated with the probiotics group, while <em>Campylobacter gracilis</em> was associated with the placebo group. No difference was observed in salivary cytokines, albumin, or any enzyme activity. The present study suggests that probiotics support the resilience of the oral microbiota in the resolution period after gingivitis.<br></p>
dc.identifier.olddbid206215
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/189242
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/44437
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082787277
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorGursoy, Ulvi
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorGursoy, Mervi
dc.okm.discipline313 Dentistryen_GB
dc.okm.discipline313 Hammaslääketieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisher.countrySwitzerlanden_GB
dc.publisher.countrySveitsifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeCH
dc.relation.articlenumber4805
dc.relation.doi10.3390/nu15224805
dc.relation.ispartofjournalNutrients
dc.relation.issue22
dc.relation.volume15
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/189242
dc.titleProbiotics Support Resilience of the Oral Microbiota during Resolution after Experimental Gingivitis - A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
nutrients-15-04805-v2.pdf
Size:
2.62 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format