Structural validity of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire and its short version, the 6-Item CTS symptoms scale: a Rasch analysis one year after surgery

dc.contributor.authorJuhani Multanen
dc.contributor.authorJari Ylinen
dc.contributor.authorTeemu Karjalainen
dc.contributor.authorJoona Ikonen
dc.contributor.authorArja Häkkinen
dc.contributor.authorJussi P. Repo
dc.contributor.organizationfi=ortopedia ja traumatologia|en=Orthopaedics and Traumatology|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.90281651480
dc.converis.publication-id50593854
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/50593854
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-25T16:08:29Z
dc.date.available2022-02-25T16:08:29Z
dc.description.abstractBackground The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) and its shorter version, the Six-Item Carpal Tunnel Symptoms Scale (CTS-6), are widely used for assessing function and/or symptoms in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. This study examined the structural validity of the BCTQ and CTS-6 among patients who had undergone surgery for treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. <div>Methods The data for this cross-sectional analysis were obtained from 217 adult patients who had undergone carpal tunnel release surgery 1 year earlier. All patients completed the CTS-6, Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) and Functional Status Scale (FSS) of the BCTQ at 12 months after surgery. The Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT) was applied to investigate the unidimensionality, residual correlation, differential item functioning, scale coverage/targeting, and person separation of the CTS-6, SSS and FSS of the BCTQ. </div><div>Results The FSS showed unidimensionality and good scale and item fit. All items showed ordered response category thresholds. Eight of the FSS items displayed differential item functioning favoring age or gender. The multidimensional structure of the CTS-6 was absorbed by creating a testlet for frequency of symptoms or testlets for pain and numbness. The testlets supported unidimensionality in the BCTQ SSS. One item in the CTS-6 and two items in the BCTQ SSS showed differential item functioning favoring age or gender. Four items in the BCTQ SSS and two items in the CTS-6 exhibited disordered response category thresholds. Merging of the relevant response categories led to ordered response category thresholds. The person separation indices were 0.73, 0.86 and 0.77 for the CTS-6, BCTQ SSS and FSS, respectively. Conclusions Based on the RMT analysis, the CTS-6 has superior psychometric properties compared to the BCTQ SSS in surgically treated patients. The CTS-6 might be more accurate when separated into item sets measuring pain or numbness. The FSS of the BCTQ has acceptable construct validity, although gender differences at some ages were observed in responses.</div>
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2474
dc.identifier.jour-issn1471-2474
dc.identifier.olddbid170154
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/153264
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/29242
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042820768
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorIkonen, Joona
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3121 Internal medicineen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3121 Sisätauditfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherBMC
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.articlenumberARTN 609
dc.relation.doi10.1186/s12891-020-03626-2
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume21
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/153264
dc.titleStructural validity of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire and its short version, the 6-Item CTS symptoms scale: a Rasch analysis one year after surgery
dc.year.issued2020

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
s12891-020-03626-2.pdf
Size:
2.81 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's version