Hiekkapohja hydrothermal system – ore mineral, lithogeochemical and paleomagnetic evidence from the Paleoproterozoic Central Finland Granitoid Complex

dc.contributor.authorHeilimo Esa
dc.contributor.authorHalonen Sini
dc.contributor.authorMertanen Satu
dc.contributor.authorNiemi Sami
dc.contributor.authorMikkola Perttu
dc.contributor.organizationfi=geologia|en=Geology |
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.72020864681
dc.converis.publication-id177884509
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/177884509
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T23:02:52Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T23:02:52Z
dc.description.abstract<p>The Paleoproterozoic Svecofennian Central Finland Granitoid Complex (CFGC) has been regarded as an area of low mineralisation potential. The Hiekkapohja area, 20km north-east of the town of Jyväskylä, host a concentration of variable metalliferous showings. Samples from mineralised boulders and outcrops display variable combinations of anomalously high concentrations of Cu, Mo, Zn, Pb, W, Pb, Ag, As, and Au. The area is composed mainly of peraluminous and ferroan granitoids. The dominant porphyritic Hiekkapohja granodiorite (~1.88 Ga) is cross-cut by the equigranular Soimavuori granite of similar age. The porphyritic Lehesvuori granite on the western side of the study area represents marginally older (~1.89 Ga) magmatism. The paragenetic sequence of the ore minerals shows that the Hiekkapohja area has been affected by at least two separate stages of hydrothermal activity. The first mineralisation stage was widespread, crystallising typically chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite, sphalerite, galena, arsenopyrite, magnetite and Ag-bearing minerals. After the first stage, a low temperature oxidising phase formed hematite and marcasite. The second mineralisation stage enclosed low temperature minerals, such as marcasite and native Ag and Ag-minerals, as inclusions inside chalcopyrite, pyrite, pyrrhotite, sphalerite, and arsenopyrite. The mineralised samples typically display signs of K-metasomatism and less commonly signs of propylitic alteration. During the second mineralisation stage the fluid flow was controlled by the dominant 120°–135° trending shear zones. Both the hydrothermal activity and the regional geology indicate that porphyry type ore forming processes have occurred in the Hiekkapohja area. Paleoproterozoic resetting of the remanent magnetisation is further evidence for the role of the hydrothermal system.<br></p>
dc.format.pagerange145
dc.format.pagerange164
dc.identifier.eissn1799-4632
dc.identifier.jour-issn0367-5211
dc.identifier.olddbid203280
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/186307
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/30787
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.17741/bgsf/94.2.003
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe202301183427
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHeilimo, Esa
dc.okm.discipline1171 Geosciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1171 Geotieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityDomestic publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherGeological Society of Finland
dc.publisher.countryFinlanden_GB
dc.publisher.countrySuomifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeFI
dc.relation.doi10.17741/bgsf/94.2.003
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBulletin of the Geological Society of Finland
dc.relation.issue2
dc.relation.volume94
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/186307
dc.titleHiekkapohja hydrothermal system – ore mineral, lithogeochemical and paleomagnetic evidence from the Paleoproterozoic Central Finland Granitoid Complex
dc.year.issued2022

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Bulletin_2_2022_sisus_.indd.pdf
Size:
1.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format