A new breast tomosynthesis imaging method: Continuous Sync-and-Shoot - technical feasibility and initial experience

dc.contributor.authorJousi MO
dc.contributor.authorErkkilä J
dc.contributor.authorVarjonen M
dc.contributor.authorSoiva M
dc.contributor.authorHukkinen K
dc.contributor.authorSequeiros RB
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kuvantaminen ja kliininen diagnostiikka|en=Imaging and Clinical Diagnostics|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.69079168212
dc.converis.publication-id39990800
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/39990800
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T22:28:09Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T22:28:09Z
dc.description.abstractBackground Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is gaining popularity in breast imaging. There are several different technical approaches for conducting DBT imaging. Purpose To determine optimal imaging parameters, test patient friendliness, evaluate the initial diagnostic performance, and describe diagnostic advances possible with the new Continuous Sync-and-Shoot method. Material and Methods Thirty-six surgical breast specimens were imaged with digital mammography (DM) and a prototype of a DBT system (Planmed Oy, Helsinki, Finland). We tested the patient friendliness of the sync-and-shoot movement without radiation exposure in eight volunteers. Different imaging parameters were tested with 20 specimens to identify the optimal combination: angular range 30 degrees, 40 degrees, and 60 degrees; pixel binning; Rhodium (Rh) and Silver (Ag) filtrations; and different kV and mAs values. Two breast radiologists evaluated 16 DM and DBT image pairs and rated six different image properties. Imaging modalities were compared with paired t-test. Results The Continuous Sync-and-Shoot method produced diagnostically valid images. Five out of eight volunteers felt no/minimal discomfort, three experienced mild discomfort from the tilting movement of the detector, with the motion being barely recognized. The combination of 30 degrees, Ag filtering, and 2 x 2 pixel binning produced the best image quality at an acceptable dose level. DBT was significantly better in all six evaluated properties (P < 0.05). Mean Dose(DBT)/Dose(DM) ratio was 1.22 (SD = 0.42). Conclusion The evaluated imaging method is feasible for imaging and analysing surgical breast specimens and DBT is significantly better than DM in image evaluation.
dc.identifier.eissn2058-4601
dc.identifier.jour-issn2058-4601
dc.identifier.olddbid202223
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/185250
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/46320
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042826667
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorBlanco Sequeiros, Roberto
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3126 Kirurgia, anestesiologia, tehohoito, radiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.articlenumberARTN 2058460119836255
dc.relation.doi10.1177/2058460119836255
dc.relation.ispartofjournalActa Radiologica Open
dc.relation.issue3
dc.relation.volume8
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/185250
dc.titleA new breast tomosynthesis imaging method: Continuous Sync-and-Shoot - technical feasibility and initial experience
dc.year.issued2019

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
2058460119836255.pdf
Size:
791.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's version