Locality and the Prevention of Early School Leaving: Supporting Youth Transitions to Upper Secondary School in a Highly Decentralised Education System

dc.contributor.authorLisbeth Lundahl
dc.contributor.authorJonna Linde
dc.contributor.authorJoakim Lindgren
dc.contributor.authorPer-Åke Rosvall
dc.contributor.authorÅsa Sundelin
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kasvatustieteiden laitos|en=Department of Education|
dc.contributor.organization-code2604100
dc.converis.publication-id52262094
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/52262094
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T14:25:52Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T14:25:52Z
dc.description.abstract<p>The introduction programme (IP) intends to facilitate transition to upper secondary education among Swedish youth with incomplete compulsory education. This article aims to explore and understand how local preconditions interact with schools’ support for the IP students. It looks at the local structural and institutional preconditions, and the strategies and work of head teachers, programme officers, teachers, and career counsellors, working in the IP in 90 municipalities of three categories: commuter municipalities close to big cities, rural municipalities, and small cities. The analysis builds on the responses from 139 school actors to a questionnaire, and on public statistics. On average, the commuter municipalities enjoy the most favourable structural and educational conditions, while the rural municipalities are the least resourceful, e.g. in terms of formal professional competence. Surprisingly however, the rural contexts on average perform better than the other municipalities regarding the level of graduation four years after starting the IP. There are few systematic local differences in the work with IP students. However, the IP in the rural municipalities on average enjoy higher support from school leaders, have a clearer division of responsibilities, and separate the students spatially to a lower degree compared to the commuter municipalities. Systematic handover between compulsory schools and the IP is less common in the commuter municipalities than in the other two groups. Whether these factors are relevant for explaining the higher success level in the rural schools and the lower success level in the schools in the commuter municipalities requires further investigation.<br /></p>
dc.format.pagerange38
dc.format.pagerange52
dc.identifier.eissn2003-8046
dc.identifier.jour-issn2003-8046
dc.identifier.olddbid188225
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/171319
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/43612
dc.identifier.urlhttp://doi.org/10.16993/njtcg.27
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042826524
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLundahl, Lisbeth
dc.okm.discipline516 Educational sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline516 Kasvatustieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherStockholm University Press
dc.publisher.countrySwedenen_GB
dc.publisher.countryRuotsifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeSE
dc.relation.doi10.16993/njtcg.27
dc.relation.ispartofjournalNordic Journal of Transitions, Careers and Guidance
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume1
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/171319
dc.titleLocality and the Prevention of Early School Leaving: Supporting Youth Transitions to Upper Secondary School in a Highly Decentralised Education System
dc.year.issued2020

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
27-160-1-PB.pdf
Size:
1.81 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher´s pdf