Semantic search as extractive paraphrase span detection

dc.contributor.authorKanerva Jenna
dc.contributor.authorKitti Hanna
dc.contributor.authorChang Li-Hsin
dc.contributor.authorVahtola Teemu
dc.contributor.authorCreutz Mathias
dc.contributor.authorGinter Filip
dc.contributor.organizationfi=data-analytiikka|en=Data-analytiikka|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.68940835793
dc.contributor.organization-code2610301
dc.converis.publication-id386822908
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/386822908
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T23:59:09Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T23:59:09Z
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we approach the problem of semantic search by introducing a task of paraphrase span detection, i.e. given a segment of text as a query phrase, the task is to identify its paraphrase in a given document, the same modelling setup as typically used in extractive question answering. While current work in paraphrasing has almost uniquely focused on sentence-level approaches, the novel span detection approach gives a possibility to retrieve a segment of arbitrary length. On the Turku Paraphrase Corpus of 100,000 manually extracted Finnish paraphrase pairs including their original document context, we find that by achieving an exact match of 88.73 our paraphrase span detection approach outperforms widely adopted sentence-level retrieval baselines (lexical similarity as well as BERT and SBERT sentence embeddings) by more than 20pp in terms of exact match, and 11pp in terms of token-level F-score. This demonstrates a strong advantage of modelling the paraphrase retrieval in terms of span extraction rather than commonly used sentence similarity, the sentence-level approaches being clearly suboptimal for applications where the retrieval targets are not guaranteed to be full sentences. Even when limiting the evaluation to sentence-level retrieval targets only, the span detection model still outperforms the sentence-level baselines by more than 4 pp in terms of exact match, and almost 6pp F-score. Additionally, we introduce a method for creating artificial paraphrase data through back-translation, suitable for languages where manually annotated paraphrase resources for training the span detection model are not available. © 2024, The Author(s).
dc.identifier.eissn1574-0218
dc.identifier.jour-issn1574-020X
dc.identifier.olddbid204979
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/188006
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/53724
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-023-09715-7
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082786640
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKanerva, Jenna
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKitti, Hanna
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorChang, Li-Hsin
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorGinter, Filip
dc.okm.discipline113 Computer and information sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline113 Tietojenkäsittely ja informaatiotieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media B.V.
dc.publisher.countryNetherlandsen_GB
dc.publisher.countryAlankomaatfi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeNL
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s10579-023-09715-7
dc.relation.ispartofjournalLanguage Resources and Evaluation
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/188006
dc.titleSemantic search as extractive paraphrase span detection
dc.year.issued2024

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
s10579-023-09715-7.pdf
Size:
1.44 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format