The effects of simulated gastric acid on the mechanical, optical, and physicochemical properties of different esthetic CAD-CAM materials

dc.contributor.authorBasol, Ece Ucar
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Ilgin
dc.contributor.authorEgilmez, Ferhan
dc.contributor.authorLassila, Lippo
dc.contributor.authorCekic-Nagas, Isil
dc.contributor.organizationfi=hammaslääketieteen laitos|en=Institute of Dentistry|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.64787032594
dc.converis.publication-id508520214
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/508520214
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-27T09:55:09Z
dc.date.available2026-01-27T09:55:09Z
dc.description.abstract<p>​​​​​​​<strong>Purpose:</strong> To investigate the effects of coffee and orange juice on 3 different esthetic ceramic materials regarding color changes, Vickers microhardness, and solubility & sorption changes among patients with reflux.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> A glass-ceramic material (IPS Emax CAD), a polymer-infiltrated ceramic material (Vita Enamic), and a nano-hybrid ceramic material (Cerasmart) were selected for this study (n=32/group). Following the polishing procedure, all the samples were immersed in artificial saliva for 21 days. Half the samples were assigned to the control group and exposed only to artificial saliva (pH 7.3). The remaining 16 samples were exposed to saliva or simulated gastric acid. Sixteen samples from each group were exposed to gastric acid 3 times daily for 30 seconds. The color, Vickers microhardness, and solubility & sorption were then measured. Following this procedure, the samples were exposed to coffee and orange juice (n=8/per group). The samples were exposed to the solutions for 16 hours and 48 minutes to simulate 21 days of consumption. Final measurements were then obtained. Statistical significance was determined using Levene’s test to compare variances, and three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test, Welch’s ANOVA, and Games–Howell’s test were applied to reveal differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> According to ANOVA, restorative material type and immersion media had a significant effect on color change (<em>P</em> < 0.001), microhardness (<em>P</em> < 0.001), and solubility & sorption (<em>P</em> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The choice of material is crucial for erosion-prone patients.</p>
dc.identifier.eissn1883-9207
dc.identifier.jour-issn1883-1958
dc.identifier.olddbid214322
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/197340
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/38977
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_25_00215
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe202601279286
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLassila, Lippo
dc.okm.discipline313 Dentistryen_GB
dc.okm.discipline313 Hammaslääketieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.publisher.countryJapanen_GB
dc.publisher.countryJapanifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeJP
dc.relation.articlenumberJPR_D_25_00215
dc.relation.doi10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_25_00215
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Prosthodontic Research
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/197340
dc.titleThe effects of simulated gastric acid on the mechanical, optical, and physicochemical properties of different esthetic CAD-CAM materials
dc.year.issued2026

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
advpub_JPR_D_25_00215.pdf
Size:
3.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format