Biomedical Signal Quality Assessment via Learning to Rank with an Application to Mechanical Heart Signals

dc.contributor.authorOlli Lahdenoja
dc.contributor.authorMojtaba Jafari Tadi
dc.contributor.authorMatti Kaisti
dc.contributor.authorTimo Knuutila
dc.contributor.authorMikko Pänkäälä
dc.contributor.authorTero Koivisto
dc.contributor.organizationfi=biolääketieteen laitos|en=Institute of Biomedicine|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kieli- ja puheteknologia|en=Language and Speech Technology|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tietojenkäsittelytiede|en=Computer Science|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.23479734818
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.47465613983
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.77952289591
dc.converis.publication-id27484632
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/27484632
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T13:59:55Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T13:59:55Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Traditionally the machine learning assisted quality assessment of biomedical signals (such as electrocardiogram - ECG, photoplethysmography - PPG) have classified a signal segment quality as ”good” or ”bad” and used this assessment to determine if the segment is usable for further processing steps, such as heart beat estimation. In principle, this is a suitable approach and can be justified by its straightforward implementation and applicability. However, in the case of body sensor networks with multiple simultaneously operating units, such as IMUs (Inertial Measurement Units) there is a need to select the best performing axes for further processing, instead of processing the data among all axes (which can be computationally intensive). For a single IMU, there are already six separate acceleration and angular velocity axes to be evaluated. In this paper, instead of classifying the signal segments simply as ”good” or ”bad” quality we propose a learning to rank based approach for the quality assessment of cardiac signals, which is able to determine the relative importance of a signal axis or waveform. We illustrate that the method can generalize between multiple human experts annotated ground truths in automated best axis selection and ranking of signal segments based on their quality.<br /></p>
dc.identifier.issn2325-8861
dc.identifier.jour-issn2325-8861
dc.identifier.olddbid185676
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/168770
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/41292
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.cinc.org/archives/2017/pdf/131-071.pdf
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042717486
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLahdenoja, Olli
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorJafari Tadi, Mojtaba
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKaisti, Matti
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKnuutila, Timo
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorPänkäälä, Mikko
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKoivisto, Tero
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline113 Computer and information sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline213 Electronic, automation and communications engineering, electronicsen_GB
dc.okm.discipline222 Other engineering and technologiesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline113 Tietojenkäsittely ja informaatiotieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.discipline213 Sähkö-, automaatio- ja tietoliikennetekniikka, elektroniikkafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline222 Muu tekniikkafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA4 Conference Article
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.conferenceComputing in Cardiology
dc.relation.doi10.22489/CinC.2017.131-071
dc.relation.ispartofjournalComputing in Cardiology
dc.relation.volume44
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/168770
dc.titleBiomedical Signal Quality Assessment via Learning to Rank with an Application to Mechanical Heart Signals
dc.title.bookComputing in Cardiology
dc.year.issued2017

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
131-071.pdf
Size:
286.39 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's version