Assessing the consistency of low vegetation characteristics estimated using harvester, handheld, and drone light detection and ranging (LiDAR) systems

dc.contributor.authorKafle, Binod
dc.contributor.authorKankare, Ville
dc.contributor.authorKaartinen, Harri
dc.contributor.authorVäätäinen, Kari
dc.contributor.authorHyyti, Heikki
dc.contributor.authorFaitli, Tamas
dc.contributor.authorHyyppä, Juha
dc.contributor.authorKukko, Antero
dc.contributor.authorKärhä, Kalle
dc.contributor.organizationfi=maantiede|en=Geography |
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.17647764921
dc.converis.publication-id499573852
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/499573852
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-21T12:44:18Z
dc.date.available2026-01-21T12:44:18Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Evaluating the potential of a harvester-mounted LiDAR system in monitoring biodiversity indicators such as low vegetation during forest harvesting could enhance sustainable forest management and habitat conservation including dense forest areas for game. However, there is a lack of understanding on the capabilities and limitations of these systems to detect low vegetation characteristics. To address this knowledge gap, this study investigated the performance of a harvester-mounted LiDAR system for measuring low vegetation (height <5 m) attributes in a boreal forest in Finland, by comparing it with handheld mobile laser scanning (HMLS) and drone laser scanning (DLS) systems. LiDAR point cloud data was collected in September 2023 to quantify the low vegetation height (maximum, mean, and percentiles), volume (voxel-based and mean height-based) and cover (grid method). Depending on the system, LiDAR point cloud data was collected either before (HMLS and DLS), during (harvester LiDAR) or after (HMLS and DLS) harvesting operations. A total of 46 fixed-sized (5 m × 5 m) grid cells were studied and analyzed. Results showed harvester-mounted LiDAR provided consistent estimates with HMLS and DLS for maximum height, 99th height percentile, and volume across various grids (5 cm, 10 cm, 20 cm) and voxel (20 cm) sizes. High correlation was observed between the systems used for these attributes. This study demonstrated that harvester-mounted LiDAR is comparable to HMLS and DLS for assessing low vegetation height and volume. The findings could assist forest harvester operators in identifying potential low vegetation and dense areas for conservation and game management.<br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn2242-4075
dc.identifier.jour-issn0037-5330
dc.identifier.olddbid212914
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/195932
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/54099
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.14214/sf.25013
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe202601216310
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKankare, Ville
dc.okm.discipline1171 Geosciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline4112 Forestryen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1171 Geotieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.discipline4112 Metsätiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityDomestic publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherFinnish Society of Forest Science
dc.publisher.countryFinlanden_GB
dc.publisher.countrySuomifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeFI
dc.relation.articlenumber25013
dc.relation.doi10.14214/sf.25013
dc.relation.ispartofjournalSilva Fennica
dc.relation.issue2
dc.relation.volume59
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/195932
dc.titleAssessing the consistency of low vegetation characteristics estimated using harvester, handheld, and drone light detection and ranging (LiDAR) systems
dc.year.issued2025

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
article25013.pdf
Size:
4.56 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format