Brief Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Sensitivity and Specificity of Clinical Diagnoses (A Multi‐Center Study)

dc.contributor.authorNykänen, Laura
dc.contributor.authorSipila, Kirsi
dc.contributor.authorEli, Ilana
dc.contributor.authorFreidman-Rubin, Pessia
dc.contributor.authorKeren, Lihi
dc.contributor.authorKamppi, Antti
dc.contributor.authorNapankangas, Ritva
dc.contributor.authorTamar, Shalev Antshel
dc.contributor.authorTanner, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorTeerijoki-Oksa, Tuija
dc.contributor.authorWinocur, Ephraim
dc.contributor.authorEmodi-Perlman, Alona
dc.contributor.organizationfi=hammaslääketieteen laitos|en=Institute of Dentistry|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.64787032594
dc.converis.publication-id491845368
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/491845368
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-24T17:57:20Z
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Background: </strong>The brief Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (bDC/TMD) was recently published to simplify the full Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) protocol.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure the inter-examiner reliability, sensitivity and specificity of bDC/TMD Axis I diagnoses against DC/TMD Axis I diagnoses in primary and tertiary clinic TMD patient populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-center (Finland, Israel) retrospective study on 334 patients' records was conducted. A full DC/TMD clinical examination data was reduced to bDC/TMD items. Five Level 3 calibrated examiners independently determined a bDC/TMD diagnosis. Inter-examiner reliability, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for individual diagnoses, using DC/TMD diagnosis as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-examiner reliability showed excellent to good reliability in all diagnoses except headache attributed to TMD, in which it was fair. Apart from headache attributed to TMD, the sensitivity of individual pain diagnoses was high. The sensitivity was lower in joint diagnoses. The specificity was high in all diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The bDC/TMD is a reliable instrument for general practitioner use.</p>
dc.format.pagerange1258
dc.format.pagerange1251
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2842
dc.identifier.jour-issn0305-182X
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/59121
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13969
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2026022315591
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorTanner, Johanna
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorTeerijoki-Oksa, Tuija
dc.okm.discipline313 Dentistryen_GB
dc.okm.discipline313 Hammaslääketieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherWiley
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.publisher.placeHOBOKEN
dc.relation.doi10.1111/joor.13969
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Oral Rehabilitation
dc.relation.issue8
dc.relation.volume52
dc.titleBrief Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Sensitivity and Specificity of Clinical Diagnoses (A Multi‐Center Study)
dc.year.issued2025

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
J of Oral Rehabilitation - 2025 - Nykänen - Brief Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Sensitivity and.pdf
Size:
234.18 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format