University language students’ evaluations of ecological, social, cultural and economic sustainability and their importance in language teaching

dc.contributor.authorKuusalu Salla-Riikka
dc.contributor.authorLaine Päivi
dc.contributor.authorMaijala Minna
dc.contributor.authorMutta Maarit
dc.contributor.authorPatzelt Mareen
dc.contributor.organizationfi=digitaalinen kielentutkimus, espanja, italia, kiina, ranska, saksa|en=Digital Language Studies, Chinese, French, German, Italian, Spanish|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kieli- ja käännöstieteiden laitos|en=School of Languages and Translation Studies|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kotimaiset kielet ja niiden sukukielet|en=Finnish, Finno-Ugric and Scandinavian languages|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.36764574459
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.56461112866
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.59108485091
dc.converis.publication-id380667909
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/380667909
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T00:12:27Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T00:12:27Z
dc.description.abstract<h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aims to explore how university language students evaluate different sustainability themes and examine the overall relevance of ecological, social, cultural and economic sustainability dimensions in language education.</p><h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3><p>A questionnaire was designed to study Finnish university language students’ (<em>n</em> = 55) order of priority for sustainability dimensions and their sub-themes and the justifications for the priority orders using a mixed methods design. Qualitative content analysis was conducted using NVivo software, and weighted rankings were used to analyse the quantitative data.</p><h3>Findings</h3><p>The findings of the study showed that language students evaluated the social and cultural dimensions as the most relevant in language teaching. In all dimensions, students approached sustainability mainly by prioritising larger issues and advancing towards smaller ones. Most non-directional responses appeared in the economic dimension. In addition, individual prioritising and justification approaches varied between different sustainability dimensions.</p><h3>Originality/value</h3><p>To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no previous studies have examined language students’ evaluations of and justifications for all four sustainability dimensions. The results highlight the need to use multiple, holistic approaches and systems thinking to incorporate education for sustainable development.</p>
dc.identifier.eissn1467-6370
dc.identifier.jour-issn1467-6370
dc.identifier.olddbid205382
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/188409
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/54330
dc.identifier.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2023-0169
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082786976
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKuusalu, Salla-Riikka
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLaine, Päivi
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorMaijala, Minna
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorPatzelt, Mareen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorMutta, Maarit
dc.okm.discipline516 Educational sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline6121 Languagesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline516 Kasvatustieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.discipline6121 Kielitieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherEmerald publishing
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.publisher.placeLeeds, England, United Kingdom
dc.relation.doi10.1108/IJSHE-05-2023-0169
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
dc.relation.issue9
dc.relation.volume25
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/188409
dc.titleUniversity language students’ evaluations of ecological, social, cultural and economic sustainability and their importance in language teaching
dc.year.issued2024

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
10-1108_IJSHE-05-2023-0169.pdf
Size:
237.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format