Unilateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy: A Study That Challenges the Dogma

dc.contributor.authorMartini Alberto
dc.contributor.authorWever Lieke
dc.contributor.authorSoeterik Timo F. W.
dc.contributor.authorRakauskas Arnas
dc.contributor.authorFankhauser Christian Daniel
dc.contributor.authorGrogg Josias Bastian
dc.contributor.authorCheccucci Enrico
dc.contributor.authorAmparore Daniele
dc.contributor.authorHaiquel Luciano
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Sanchez Lara
dc.contributor.authorPloussard Guillaume
dc.contributor.authorQiang Peng
dc.contributor.authorAffentranger Andres
dc.contributor.authorMarquis Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorMarra Giancarlo
dc.contributor.authorEttala Otto
dc.contributor.authorZattoni Fabio
dc.contributor.authorFalagario Ugo Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorDe Angelis Mario
dc.contributor.authorKesch Claudia
dc.contributor.authorApfelbeck Maria
dc.contributor.authorAl-Hammouri Tarek
dc.contributor.authorKretschmer Alexander
dc.contributor.authorKasivisvanathan Veeru
dc.contributor.authorPreisser Felix
dc.contributor.authorLefebvre Emilie
dc.contributor.authorOlivier Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorRadtke Jan Philipp
dc.contributor.authorBriganti Alberto
dc.contributor.authorMontorsi Francesco
dc.contributor.authorCarrieri Giuseppe
dc.contributor.authorDal Moro Fabrizio
dc.contributor.authorBoström Peter
dc.contributor.authorJambor Ivan
dc.contributor.authorGontero Paolo
dc.contributor.authorChiu Peter K.
dc.contributor.authorJohn Hubert
dc.contributor.authorMacek Petr
dc.contributor.authorPorpiglia Francesco
dc.contributor.authorHermanns Thomas
dc.contributor.authorvan den Bergh Roderick C.N.
dc.contributor.authorvan Basten Jean-Paul A.
dc.contributor.authorGandaglia Giorgio
dc.contributor.authorValerio Massimo
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kirurgia|en=Surgery|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kuvantaminen ja kliininen diagnostiikka|en=Imaging and Clinical Diagnostics|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.69079168212
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.97295082107
dc.converis.publication-id180705069
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/180705069
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T23:17:11Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T23:17:11Z
dc.description.abstract<p>PURPOSE<br>Bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical prostatectomy is the current standard of care if pelvic lymph node dissection is indicated; often, however, pelvic lymph node dissection is performed in pN0 disease. With the more accurate staging achieved with magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis, the indication for bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection may be revised<em>.</em> We aimed to assess the feasibility of unilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection in the era of modern prostate cancer imaging.<br></p><p>MATERIALS AND METHODS<br>We analyzed a multi-institutional data set of men with cN0 disease diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy who underwent prostatectomy and bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection. The outcome of the study was lymph node invasion contralateral to the prostatic lobe with worse disease features, ie, dominant lobe. Logistic regression to predict lymph node invasion contralateral to the dominant lobe was generated and internally validated.<br></p><p>RESULTS<br>Overall, data from 2,253 patients were considered. Lymph node invasion was documented in 302 (13%) patients; 83 (4%) patients had lymph node invasion contralateral to the dominant prostatic lobe. A model including prostate-specific antigen, maximum diameter of the index lesion, seminal vesicle invasion on magnetic resonance imaging, International Society of Urological Pathology grade in the nondominant side, and percentage of positive cores in the nondominant side achieved an area under the curve of 84% after internal validation. With a cutoff of contralateral lymph node invasion of 1%, 602 (27%) contralateral pelvic lymph node dissections would be omitted with only 1 (1.2%) lymph node invasion missed.<br></p><p>CONCLUSIONS<br>Pelvic lymph node dissection could be omitted contralateral to the prostate lobe with worse disease features in selected patients. We propose a model that can help avoid contralateral pelvic lymph node dissection in almost one-third of cases.<br></p>
dc.format.pagerange117
dc.format.pagerange127
dc.identifier.eissn1527-3792
dc.identifier.jour-issn0022-5347
dc.identifier.olddbid203730
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/186757
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/46953
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003442
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082790207
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorEttala, Otto
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorBoström, Peter
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorJambor, Ivan
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3122 Cancersen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3122 Syöpätauditfi_FI
dc.okm.discipline3126 Kirurgia, anestesiologia, tehohoito, radiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.doi10.1097/JU.0000000000003442
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Urology
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume210
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/186757
dc.titleUnilateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy: A Study That Challenges the Dogma
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
JU.0000000000003442.pdf
Size:
635.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format