Foreign in the Icelandic name law debate
| dc.contributor.author | Kendra Willson | |
| dc.contributor.organization | fi=Turun ihmistieteiden tutkijakollegium (TIAS)|en=Turku Institute for Advanced Studies (TIAS)| | |
| dc.contributor.organization | fi=pohjoismaiset kielet|en=Scandinavian Languages| | |
| dc.contributor.organization-code | 1.2.246.10.2458963.20.56102455757 | |
| dc.converis.publication-id | 25416822 | |
| dc.converis.url | https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/25416822 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-28T13:42:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-10-28T13:42:36Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | <p>Discussion of name law in Iceland often compares the name rights of foreigners</p><p>and those of Icelanders, both contrasting Icelandic laws with</p><p>those of other countries and considering the name rights of immigrants</p><p>to Iceland and of Icelanders living abroad. The policy which, from 1952</p><p>until 1996, required foreign-born persons seeking Icelandic citizenship to</p><p>have Icelandic names stemmed from a puristic tradition based in the nationalistic</p><p>movement of the 19th and 20th centuries, as well as reflecting</p><p>the assimilationist policies toward ethnic others that were widespread in</p><p>Europe in the mid-20th century. The elimination of the name change requirement</p><p>was framed as a matter of human rights and connected with a</p><p>general shift toward pluralism and multiculturalism. However, inasmuch</p><p>as the revised name law granted .special. name rights to naturalized citizens</p><p>and the children of foreign-born parents, it created a new inequality.</p><p>This was connected in the popular discourse to the existing inequalities in</p><p>name law concerning fixed surnames. Fixed surnames were regarded at</p><p>the start of the the 20th century as .un-Icelandic. .parasitic culture.</p><p>and a threat to the traditional patronymic system. The name law of 1925</p><p>banned new surnames but .grandfathered. in existing fixed surnames, a</p><p>problematic decision which has led to much subsequent dissatisfaction.</p><p>Several attempts to amend the name law between 1955 and 1971 failed in</p><p>part because the issue of surnames was so controversial. Those who object</p><p>to the current name law regard immigrants' rights to keep their original</p><p>surnames and to have names that do not fulfill the general criteria of the</p><p>Icelandic name law as a form of reverse discrimination. The law is very</p><p>unpopular and the current situation unstable. Most likely the law will be</p><p> </p><p>liberalized radically in the coming years.</p> | |
| dc.format.pagerange | 161 | |
| dc.format.pagerange | 184 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-91-7276-097-4 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0346-6728 | |
| dc.identifier.olddbid | 183790 | |
| dc.identifier.oldhandle | 10024/166884 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/41176 | |
| dc.identifier.url | https://tampub.uta.fi/handle/10024/101708 | |
| dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042717009 | |
| dc.okm.affiliatedauthor | Willson, Kendra | |
| dc.okm.affiliatedauthor | Dataimport, TIAS-tutkijakollegiumin yhteiset | |
| dc.okm.discipline | 616 Other humanities | en_GB |
| dc.okm.discipline | 616 Muut humanistiset tieteet | fi_FI |
| dc.okm.internationalcopublication | not an international co-publication | |
| dc.okm.internationality | International publication | |
| dc.okm.type | A4 Conference Article | |
| dc.publisher.country | Finland | en_GB |
| dc.publisher.country | Suomi | fi_FI |
| dc.publisher.country-code | FI | |
| dc.publisher.place | Uppsala, Tammerfors | |
| dc.relation.conference | Namn och identitet | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Norna-rapporter | |
| dc.relation.volume | 94 | |
| dc.source.identifier | https://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/166884 | |
| dc.title | Foreign in the Icelandic name law debate | |
| dc.title.book | Namn och identitet: handlingar från Nornas 46:e symposium i Tammerfors den 21-23 oktober 2015 | |
| dc.year.issued | 2017 |
Tiedostot
1 - 1 / 1