Foreign in the Icelandic name law debate

dc.contributor.authorKendra Willson
dc.contributor.organizationfi=Turun ihmistieteiden tutkijakollegium (TIAS)|en=Turku Institute for Advanced Studies (TIAS)|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=pohjoismaiset kielet|en=Scandinavian Languages|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.56102455757
dc.converis.publication-id25416822
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/25416822
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T13:42:36Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T13:42:36Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Discussion of name law in Iceland often compares the name rights of foreigners</p><p>and those of Icelanders, both contrasting Icelandic laws with</p><p>those of other countries and considering the name rights of immigrants</p><p>to Iceland and of Icelanders living abroad. The policy which, from 1952</p><p>until 1996, required foreign-born persons seeking Icelandic citizenship to</p><p>have Icelandic names stemmed from a puristic tradition based in the nationalistic</p><p>movement of the 19th and 20th centuries, as well as reflecting</p><p>the assimilationist policies toward ethnic others that were widespread in</p><p>Europe in the mid-20th century. The elimination of the name change requirement</p><p>was framed as a matter of human rights and connected with a</p><p>general shift toward pluralism and multiculturalism. However, inasmuch</p><p>as the revised name law granted .special. name rights to naturalized citizens</p><p>and the children of foreign-born parents, it created a new inequality.</p><p>This was connected in the popular discourse to the existing inequalities in</p><p>name law concerning fixed surnames. Fixed surnames were regarded at</p><p>the start of the the 20th century as .un-Icelandic. .parasitic culture.</p><p>and a threat to the traditional patronymic system. The name law of 1925</p><p>banned new surnames but .grandfathered. in existing fixed surnames, a</p><p>problematic decision which has led to much subsequent dissatisfaction.</p><p>Several attempts to amend the name law between 1955 and 1971 failed in</p><p>part because the issue of surnames was so controversial. Those who object</p><p>to the current name law regard immigrants' rights to keep their original</p><p>surnames and to have names that do not fulfill the general criteria of the</p><p>Icelandic name law as a form of reverse discrimination. The law is very</p><p>unpopular and the current situation unstable. Most likely the law will be</p><p> </p><p>liberalized radically in the coming years.</p>
dc.format.pagerange161
dc.format.pagerange184
dc.identifier.isbn978-91-7276-097-4
dc.identifier.issn0346-6728
dc.identifier.olddbid183790
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/166884
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/41176
dc.identifier.urlhttps://tampub.uta.fi/handle/10024/101708
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042717009
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorWillson, Kendra
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, TIAS-tutkijakollegiumin yhteiset
dc.okm.discipline616 Other humanitiesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline616 Muut humanistiset tieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA4 Conference Article
dc.publisher.countryFinlanden_GB
dc.publisher.countrySuomifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeFI
dc.publisher.placeUppsala, Tammerfors
dc.relation.conferenceNamn och identitet
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNorna-rapporter
dc.relation.volume94
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/166884
dc.titleForeign in the Icelandic name law debate
dc.title.bookNamn och identitet: handlingar från Nornas 46:e symposium i Tammerfors den 21-23 oktober 2015
dc.year.issued2017

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
kjwutlenskt.pdf
Size:
180.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format