Academic-practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing practice: a scoping review protocol

dc.contributor.authorHalili Xirongguli
dc.contributor.authorVälimäki Maritta
dc.contributor.authorLi Zeen
dc.contributor.authorTang Siyuan
dc.contributor.authorWang Honghong
dc.contributor.authorChen Qirong
dc.contributor.organizationfi=hoitotieteen laitos|en=Department of Nursing Science|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.27201741504
dc.converis.publication-id176791248
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/176791248
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-29T15:46:12Z
dc.date.available2022-11-29T15:46:12Z
dc.description.abstract<p><b>Introduction </b><br></p><p>Academic-practice partnerships are a promising strategy that could strengthen the promotion and innovation of evidence-based nursing practice (EBNP). However, there is little evidence of how academic and clinical institutions and individuals should collaborate in each process of EBNP and the factors that influence academic-practice partnerships in EBNP. There is a pressing need to explore the extent of the literature on academic-practice partnerships in EBNP, as well as to classify, compare and summarise the results or opinions obtained from various types of literature to identify both existing knowledge and gaps in the research.<br></p><p><b>Methods and analysis</b> <br></p><p>The scoping review will be conducted following the methodological guidelines provided by the JBI. The scoping review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Seven databases, including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Educational Resource Information Center and two Chinese databases (ie, CNKI and WANFANG DATA), will be searched. The grey literature will also be searched using the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, American Nurses Association, Open Grey, Grey Literature Report and the official website of JBI. The literature screening and data extraction will be conducted independently by two researchers. A third researcher will be involved when a consensus is needed.<br></p><p><b>Ethics and dissemination </b><br></p><p>Ethics approval is not required. The findings of the scoping review will be disseminated in a conference and a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
dc.identifier.jour-issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.olddbid190142
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/173233
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/32659
dc.identifier.urlhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/9/e065049
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2022112967710
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorVälimäki, Maritta
dc.okm.discipline316 Nursingen_GB
dc.okm.discipline316 Hoitotiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA2 Scientific Article
dc.publisherBMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.articlenumbere065049
dc.relation.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065049
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBMJ Open
dc.relation.issue9
dc.relation.volume12
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/173233
dc.titleAcademic-practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing practice: a scoping review protocol
dc.year.issued2022

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
e065049.full.pdf
Size:
545.11 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format