A comparison of diffusion tensor imaging tractography and constrained spherical deconvolution with automatic segmentation in traumatic brain injury

dc.contributor.authorTallus Jussi
dc.contributor.authorMohammadian Mehrbod
dc.contributor.authorKurki Timo
dc.contributor.authorRoine Timo
dc.contributor.authorPosti Jussi P.
dc.contributor.authorTenovuo Olli
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kliininen laitos|en=Department of Clinical Medicine|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kliiniset neurotieteet|en=Clinical Neurosciences|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=lääketieteellinen tiedekunta|en=Faculty of Medicine|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.13290506867
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.74845969893
dc.contributor.organization-code2607300
dc.converis.publication-id178813902
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/178813902
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-21T12:25:05Z
dc.date.available2026-01-21T12:25:05Z
dc.description.abstractDetection of microstructural white matter injury in traumatic brain injury (TBI) requires specialised imaging methods, of which diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has been extensively studied. Newer fibre alignment estimation methods, such as constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD), are better than DTI in resolving crossing fibres that are ubiquitous in the brain and may improve the ability to detect microstructural injuries. Furthermore, auto-matic tract segmentation has the potential to improve tractography reliability and accelerate workflow compared to the manual segmentation commonly used. In this study, we compared the results of deterministic DTI based tractography and manual tract segmentation with CSD based probabilistic tractography and automatic tract segmentation using TractSeg. 37 participants with a history of TBI (with Glasgow Coma Scale 13-15) and persistent symptoms, and 41 healthy controls underwent deterministic DTI-based tractography with manual tract segmentation and probabilistic CSD-based tractography with TractSeg automatic segmentation.Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity of corpus callosum and three bilateral association tracts were measured. FA and MD values derived from both tractography methods were generally moderately to strongly correlated. CSD with TractSeg differentiated the groups based on FA, while DTI did not. CSD and TractSeg-based tractography may be more sensitive in detecting microstructural changes associated with TBI than deterministic DTI trac-tography. Additionally, CSD with TractSeg was found to be applicable at lower b-value and number of diffusion-encoding gradients data than previously reported.
dc.identifier.eissn2213-1582
dc.identifier.jour-issn2213-1582
dc.identifier.olddbid212454
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/195472
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/52116
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103284
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2023030830596
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorTallus, Jussi
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorMohammadian, Mehrbod
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKurki, Timo
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorPosti, Jussi
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorTenovuo, Olli
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3112 Neurosciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3112 Neurotieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD
dc.publisher.countryNetherlandsen_GB
dc.publisher.countryAlankomaatfi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeNL
dc.relation.articlenumber103284
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103284
dc.relation.ispartofjournalNeuroImage: Clinical
dc.relation.volume37
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/195472
dc.titleA comparison of diffusion tensor imaging tractography and constrained spherical deconvolution with automatic segmentation in traumatic brain injury
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
1-s2.0-S2213158222003497-main.pdf
Size:
2.39 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format