Operationalizing the biocultural perspective part II: A review of biocultural action principles since The Declaration of Belém

dc.contributor.authorWall Jeffrey
dc.contributor.authorLukawiecki Jessica
dc.contributor.authorYoung Rachel
dc.contributor.authorPowell Lara
dc.contributor.authorMcAlvay Alex
dc.contributor.authorMoola Faisal
dc.contributor.organizationfi=digitaalisen kulttuurin, maiseman ja kulttuuriperinnön tutkimus|en=Degree Programme in Digital Culture, Landscape and Cultural Heritage|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.77579741941
dc.converis.publication-id180939351
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/180939351
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T02:54:21Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T02:54:21Z
dc.description.abstract<p>In part 1 of our review of the biocultural conservation literature - conducted in 2019 - we utilized a rapid appraisal approach to determine that while the biocultural perspective was born within the action-oriented and Indigenous People and Local Community (IPLC)-Centered Declaration of Belém, the subsequent scientific discussion remained largely in a conceptual holding pattern. In Part 2, we reengage the literature later in time - mid-2021 - and with a more intensive qualitative analysis methodology to pursue the trends we observed and to more deeply perceive and comprehend the operating principles of the most impactful biocultural action research, which we define as research that fulfills the clear prescriptions of the Declaration of Belém. Toward these ends, we develop and utilize a systematic review methodology including thematic analysis, appreciative inquiry, and collaborative analysis. Our findings not only show an increasing concentration of action-orientation in the emerging literature, but identify and increase comprehension of the core operating principles for biocultural action. We determine that biocultural studies adhered to the following principles: 1) honor IPLC place attachment; 2) rigorously engage with IPLC's; 3) valorize cultural survival and continuity; 4) invert power dynamics; and 5) cultivate new insights. Our results represent a one-of-a-kind diagnostic on the fulfillment of the Declaration of Belém's prescriptions in conservation scholarship and practice, as well as a roadmap for practicing scholars and policy-makers intent on guaranteeing IPLC environmental leadership. These newly forged resources further point the way toward understanding and operationalizing the biocultural perspective as a strategic vision.<br></p>
dc.identifier.jour-issn1462-9011
dc.identifier.olddbid209905
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/192932
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/49766
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103573
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082788487
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorWall, Jeffrey
dc.okm.discipline1172 Environmental sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline519 Social and economic geographyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1172 Ympäristötiedefi_FI
dc.okm.discipline519 Yhteiskuntamaantiede, talousmaantiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA2 Scientific Article
dc.publisherElSevier
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103573
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
dc.relation.volume150
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/192932
dc.titleOperationalizing the biocultural perspective part II: A review of biocultural action principles since The Declaration of Belém
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
1-s2.0-S1462901123002228-main.pdf
Size:
3.72 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format