Fibre-reinforced composites as root canal posts

dc.contributorInstitute of Dentistryen
dc.contributor.authorLe Bell-Rönnlöf, Anna-Maria
dc.contributor.facultyfi=Lääketieteellinen tiedekunta|en=Faculty of Medicine|
dc.date.accessioned2007-12-27T09:34:22Z
dc.date.available2007-12-27T09:34:22Z
dc.date.issued2007-12-07
dc.description.abstractFibre-reinforced composite (FRC) root canal posts are suggested to have biomechanical benefits over traditional metallic posts, but they lack good adhesion to resin composites. The aim of this series of studies was to evaluate the adhesion of individually formed fibre-reinforced composite material to composite resin and dentin, as well as some mechanical properties. Flexural properties were evaluated and compared between individually formed FRC post material and different prefabricated posts. The depth of polymerization of the individually formed FRC post material was evaluated with IR spectrophotometry and microhardness measurements, and compared to that of resin without fibres. Bonding properties of the individually formed FRC post to resin cements and dentin were tested using Pull-out- and Push-out-force tests, evaluated with scanning electron microscopy, and compared to those of prefabricated FRC and metal posts. Load-bearing capacity and microstrain were evaluated and failure mode assessment was made on incisors restored with individually formed FRC posts of different structures and prefabricated posts. The results of these studies show that the individually polymerized and formed FRC post material had higher flexural properties compared to the commercial prefabricated FRC posts. The individually polymerized FRC material showed almost the same degree of conversion after light polymerization as monomer resin without fibres. Moreover, it was found that the individually formed FRC post material with a semiinterpenetrating polymer network (IPN) polymer matrix bonded better to composite resin luting cement, than did the prefabricated posts with a cross-linked polymer matrix. Furthermore, it was found that, contrary to the other posts, there were no adhesive failures between the individually formed FRC posts and composite resin luting cement. This suggests better interfacial adhesion of cements to these posts. Although no differences in load-bearing capacity or microstrain could be seen, the incisors restored with individually formed FRC posts with a hollow structure showed more favourable failures compared to other prefabricated posts. These studies suggest that it is possible to use individually formed FRC material with semi-IPN polymer matrix as root canal post material. They also indicate that there are benefits especially regarding the bonding properties to composite resin and dentin with this material compared to prefabricated FRC post material with a cross-linked matrix. Furthermore, clinically more repairable failures were found with this material compared to those of prefabricated posts.en
dc.description.accessibilityfeatureei tietoa saavutettavuudesta
dc.description.notificationSiirretty Doriasta
dc.format.contentfulltext
dc.identifierISBN 978-951-29-3428-7en
dc.identifier.olddbid33935
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/33576
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/27677
dc.identifier.urnURN:ISBN:978-951-29-3428-7
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherfi=Turun yliopisto|en=University of Turku|en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTurun yliopiston julkaisuja. Sarja D, Medica – Odontologica
dc.relation.issn2343-3213
dc.relation.numberinseries780-
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/33576
dc.subject.meshComposite Resinsen
dc.subject.meshMaterials Testingen
dc.subject.meshRoot Canal Filling Materialsen
dc.subject.meshDental Materialsen
dc.subject.ysakomposiititfi
dc.subject.ysajuurihoitofi
dc.subject.ysaodontologiafi
dc.titleFibre-reinforced composites as root canal postsen
dc.type.ontasotfi=Artikkeliväitöskirja|en=Doctoral dissertation (article-based)|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
D780.pdf
Size:
5.91 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format