How to explain AI systems to end users: a systematic literature review and research agenda
| dc.contributor.author | Laato Samuli | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tiainen Miika | |
| dc.contributor.author | Islam AKM Najmul | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mäntymäki Matti | |
| dc.contributor.organization | fi=tietojärjestelmätiede|en=Information Systems Science| | |
| dc.contributor.organization | fi=tietotekniikan laitos|en=Department of Computing| | |
| dc.contributor.organization-code | 1.2.246.10.2458963.20.70128852004 | |
| dc.contributor.organization-code | 2610300 | |
| dc.converis.publication-id | 175415216 | |
| dc.converis.url | https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/175415216 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-28T12:22:46Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-10-28T12:22:46Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | <p>Purpose <br></p><p>Inscrutable machine learning (ML) models are part of increasingly many information systems. Understanding how these models behave, and what their output is based on, is a challenge for developers let alone non-technical end users. <br></p><p>Design/methodology/approach <br></p><p>The authors investigate how AI systems and their decisions ought to be explained for end users through a systematic literature review. <br></p><p>Findings <br></p><p>The authors' synthesis of the literature suggests that AI system communication for end users has five high-level goals: (1) understandability, (2) trustworthiness, (3) transparency, (4) controllability and (5) fairness. The authors identified several design recommendations, such as offering personalized and on-demand explanations and focusing on the explainability of key functionalities instead of aiming to explain the whole system. There exists multiple trade-offs in AI system explanations, and there is no single best solution that fits all cases. <br></p><p>Research limitations/implications <br></p><p>Based on the synthesis, the authors provide a design framework for explaining AI systems to end users. The study contributes to the work on AI governance by suggesting guidelines on how to make AI systems more understandable, fair, trustworthy, controllable and transparent. <br></p><p>Originality/value <br></p><p>This literature review brings together the literature on AI system communication and explainable AI (XAI) for end users. Building on previous academic literature on the topic, it provides synthesized insights, design recommendations and future research agenda.</p> | |
| dc.format.pagerange | 1 | |
| dc.format.pagerange | 31 | |
| dc.identifier.jour-issn | 1066-2243 | |
| dc.identifier.olddbid | 176250 | |
| dc.identifier.oldhandle | 10024/159344 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/31460 | |
| dc.identifier.url | https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/INTR-08-2021-0600/full/html | |
| dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi-fe2022081154014 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.okm.affiliatedauthor | Laato, Samuli | |
| dc.okm.affiliatedauthor | Islam, Najmul | |
| dc.okm.affiliatedauthor | Mäntymäki, Matti | |
| dc.okm.discipline | 113 Computer and information sciences | en_GB |
| dc.okm.discipline | 113 Tietojenkäsittely ja informaatiotieteet | fi_FI |
| dc.okm.internationalcopublication | not an international co-publication | |
| dc.okm.internationality | International publication | |
| dc.okm.type | A2 Scientific Article | |
| dc.publisher | EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD | |
| dc.publisher.country | United Kingdom | en_GB |
| dc.publisher.country | Britannia | fi_FI |
| dc.publisher.country-code | GB | |
| dc.relation.doi | 10.1108/INTR-08-2021-0600 | |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal | Internet Research | |
| dc.relation.issue | 7 | |
| dc.relation.volume | 32 | |
| dc.source.identifier | https://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/159344 | |
| dc.title | How to explain AI systems to end users: a systematic literature review and research agenda | |
| dc.year.issued | 2022 |
Tiedostot
1 - 1 / 1