Assessment of dosimetric and positioning accuracy of a magnetic resonance imaging-only solution for external beam radiotherapy of pelvic anatomy

dc.contributor.authorKemppainen R.
dc.contributor.authorSuilamo S.
dc.contributor.authorRanta I.
dc.contributor.authorPesola M.
dc.contributor.authorHalkola A.
dc.contributor.authorEufemio A.
dc.contributor.authorMinn H.
dc.contributor.authorKeyriläinen J.
dc.contributor.organizationfi=fysiikan ja tähtitieteen laitos|en=Department of Physics and Astronomy|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kliininen syöpätautioppi|en=Clinical Oncology|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.55477946762
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.74978886054
dc.contributor.organization-code2606700
dc.converis.publication-id42453402
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/42453402
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T13:13:18Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T13:13:18Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Background and purpose: The clinical feasibility of synthetic computed tomography (sCT) images derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images for external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) planning have been studied and adopted into clinical use recently. This paper evaluates the dosimetric and positioning performance of a sCT approach for different pelvic cancers.<br /><br />Materials and methods: Seventy-five patients receiving EBRT at Turku University Hospital (Turku, Finland) were enrolled in the study. The sCT images were generated as part of a clinical MRI-simulation procedure. Dose calculation accuracy was assessed by comparing the sCT-based calculation with a CT-based calculation. In addition, we evaluated the patient position verification accuracy for both digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) -based image guidance using a subset of the cohort. Furthermore, the relevance of using continuous Hounsfield unit values was assessed.<br /><br />Results: The mean (standard deviation) relative dose difference in the planning target volume mean dose computed over various cancer groups was less than 0.2 (0.4)% between sCT and CT. Among all groups, the average minimum gamma-index pass-rates were better than 95% with a 2%/2mm gamma-criteria. The difference between sCT- and CT-DRR-based patient positioning was less than 0.3 (1.4) mm in all directions. The registrations of sCT to CBCT produced similar results as compared with CT to CBCT registrations.<br /><br />Conclusions: The use of sCT for clinical EBRT dose calculation and patient positioning in the investigated types of pelvic cancers was dosimetrically and geometrically accurate for clinical use.<br /><br /></p>
dc.format.pagerange1
dc.format.pagerange8
dc.identifier.jour-issn2405-6316
dc.identifier.olddbid180583
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/163677
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/31863
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631618300885
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042821846
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorRanta, Iiro
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorMinn, Heikki
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKeyriläinen, Jani
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3126 Kirurgia, anestesiologia, tehohoito, radiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltd
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.phro.2019.06.001
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPhysics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
dc.relation.volume11
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/163677
dc.titleAssessment of dosimetric and positioning accuracy of a magnetic resonance imaging-only solution for external beam radiotherapy of pelvic anatomy
dc.year.issued2019

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Kemppainen_et_al_1-s2.0-S2405631618300885.pdf
Size:
1.5 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's PDF