Risk of donor-site lymphatic vessel dysfunction after microvascular lymph node transfer

dc.contributor.authorSulo E
dc.contributor.authorHartiala P
dc.contributor.authorViitanen T
dc.contributor.authorMäki M
dc.contributor.authorSeppänen M
dc.contributor.authorSaarikko A
dc.contributor.organizationfi=PET-keskus|en=Turku PET Centre|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kirurgia|en=Surgery|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kliininen laitos|en=Department of Clinical Medicine|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.61334543354
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.97295082107
dc.converis.publication-id2168654
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/2168654
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-27T12:21:52Z
dc.date.available2022-10-27T12:21:52Z
dc.description.abstract<h4> BACKGROUND:</h4> <p> Microvascular lymph node transfer has been used to improve lymphatic function in patients with lymphoedema. We previously reported changes in the lymphatic function of the donor limb after lymph node transfer. For this reason, we modified our surgical method to be more conservative.</p> <h4> SUBJECTS AND METHODS:</h4> <p> Microvascular lymph node transfer was performed in 13 patients using the previously reported original method. Sixteen patients were operated upon using the more conservative modified method. Lymphatic function in the donor limb was evaluated using volumetry, lymphoscintigraphy and tissue water percentage.</p> <h4> RESULTS:</h4> <p> In the original method group, the donor-limb volume was on average greater (199 ± 540 ml) than in the non-operated control limb. The volume difference between the limbs was smaller (151 ± 463 ml) in the modified method group. Two patients in the original method group had abnormal transport index (Ti) values in lymphoscintigraphy indicating decreased lymphatic function of the donor limb. In the modified method group, the Ti-values remained normal. The tissue water percentage of the donor limb was on average 40% ± 4% in the original method group and 40% ± 3% in the modified method group. Importantly, none of the patients in either group developed clinical lymphoedema in the donor limb during the 11-84-month follow-up.</p> <h4> CONCLUSIONS:</h4> <p> Even with the more conservative lymph node transfer method, we can observe slight, subclinical signs of lymphatic dysfunction in the donor limb. These results highlight the importance of minimizing the surgical exploration in the inguinal area and avoiding damage to the lymphatic vessels or sentinel nodes draining the lower limb.</p>
dc.format.pagerange551
dc.format.pagerange558
dc.identifier.jour-issn1748-6815
dc.identifier.olddbid175004
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/158098
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/35244
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042714498
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorRannikko, Eeva
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHartiala, Pauliina
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSeppänen, Marko
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, 2609820 PET Tutkimus
dc.okm.discipline3121 Internal medicineen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3121 Sisätauditfi_FI
dc.okm.discipline3126 Kirurgia, anestesiologia, tehohoito, radiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.bjps.2014.11.016
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
dc.relation.issue4
dc.relation.volume68
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/158098
dc.titleRisk of donor-site lymphatic vessel dysfunction after microvascular lymph node transfer
dc.year.issued2015

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Sulo et al..doc
Size:
157.5 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word
Description:
Final draft