Transmission of Curing Light through Moist, Air-Dried, and EDTA Treated Dentine and Enamel

dc.contributor.authorUusitalo E
dc.contributor.authorVarrela J
dc.contributor.authorLassila L
dc.contributor.authorVallittu PK
dc.contributor.organizationfi=hammaslääketieteen laitos|en=Institute of Dentistry|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.64787032594
dc.converis.publication-id17170296
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/17170296
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-21T13:44:50Z
dc.date.available2026-01-21T13:44:50Z
dc.description.abstractObjective. This study measured light transmission through enamel and dentin and the effect of exposed dentinal tubules to light propagation. Methods. Light attenuation through enamel and dentin layers of various thicknesses (1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, and 4 mm) was measured using specimens that were (1) moist and (2) air-dried (n = 5). Measurements were repeated after the specimens were treated with EDTA. Specimens were transilluminated with a light curing unit (maximum power output 1869 mW/cm(2)), and the mean irradiance power of transmitting light was measured. The transmission of light through teeth was studied using 10 extracted intact human incisors and premolars. Results. Transmitted light irradiance through 1 mm thick moist discs was 500 mW/cm(2) for enamel and 398 mW/cm(2) for dentin (p < 0.05). The increase of the specimen thickness decreased light transmission in all groups (p < 0.005), and moist specimens attenuated light less than air-dried specimens in all thicknesses (p < 0.05). EDTA treatment increased light transmission from 398 mW/cm(2) to 439 mW/cm(2) (1 mm dentin specimen thickness) (p < 0.05). Light transmission through intact premolar was 6.2 mW/cm(2) (average thickness 8.2 mm) and through incisor was 37.6 mW/cm(2) (average thickness 5.6 mm). Conclusion. Light transmission through enamel is greater than that through dentin, probably reflecting differences in refractive indices and extinction coefficients. Light transmission through enamel, dentin, and extracted teeth seemed to follow Beer-Lambert's law.
dc.identifier.eissn2314-6141
dc.identifier.jour-issn2314-6133
dc.identifier.olddbid213316
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/196334
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/55148
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042715618
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorVarrela, Juha
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLassila, Lippo
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorVallittu, Pekka
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorMäkinen, Erika
dc.okm.discipline220 Industrial biotechnologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline313 Dentistryen_GB
dc.okm.discipline220 Teollinen bioteknologiafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline313 Hammaslääketieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherHINDAWI PUBLISHING CORP
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.articlenumberARTN 5713962
dc.relation.doi10.1155/2016/5713962
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBioMed Research International
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/196334
dc.titleTransmission of Curing Light through Moist, Air-Dried, and EDTA Treated Dentine and Enamel
dc.year.issued2016

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Transmission of Curing Light through Moist, Air-Dried, and EDTA Treated Dentine and Enamel.pdf
Size:
1.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format