What do prospective mathematics teachers mean by “definitions can be proved”?
| dc.contributor.author | Merve Dilberoğlu | |
| dc.contributor.author | Çiğdem Haser | |
| dc.contributor.author | Erdinç Çakıroğlu | |
| dc.contributor.organization | fi=opettajankoulutuslaitos (Rauma)|en=Department of Teacher Education (Rauma)| | |
| dc.contributor.organization-code | 1.2.246.10.2458963.20.99310884848 | |
| dc.converis.publication-id | 44664829 | |
| dc.converis.url | https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/44664829 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-28T00:12:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-28T00:12:36Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | <p> </p><p>The research reported here is part of an ongoing study in which prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of definition are investigated through their responses to semi-structured interview questions about defining quadrilaterals. Here we present findings from their responses to a subset of the interview questions, with the purpose of understanding what they mean by the expression “definitions can be proved”- an expression commonly referenced, and considered as erroneous in the research literature. Analysis of the responses, through using thematic coding and Toulmin’s (1958) scheme, revealed that participants attributed two different meanings to the phrase: (1) proving the claim that a written definition accurately designates an intended concept and (2) proving the concept being defined (erroneous). Based on our findings, we point to a reconsideration of the phenomenon by the research community. </p><p></p><p><br /></p> | |
| dc.format.pagerange | 181 | |
| dc.format.pagerange | 188 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-90-73346-75-8 | |
| dc.identifier.olddbid | 205386 | |
| dc.identifier.oldhandle | 10024/188413 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/54312 | |
| dc.identifier.url | https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02398094v1 | |
| dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042821671 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.okm.affiliatedauthor | Haser, Çiğdem | |
| dc.okm.discipline | 516 Educational sciences | en_GB |
| dc.okm.discipline | 516 Kasvatustieteet | fi_FI |
| dc.okm.internationalcopublication | international co-publication | |
| dc.okm.internationality | International publication | |
| dc.okm.type | A4 Conference Article | |
| dc.publisher.country | Netherlands | en_GB |
| dc.publisher.country | Alankomaat | fi_FI |
| dc.publisher.country-code | NL | |
| dc.relation.conference | Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education | |
| dc.source.identifier | https://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/188413 | |
| dc.title | What do prospective mathematics teachers mean by “definitions can be proved”? | |
| dc.title.book | Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education | |
| dc.year.issued | 2019 |
Tiedostot
1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
- Name:
- TWG01_13_GS_AMR.pdf
- Size:
- 586 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- julkaisijan versio