AI-algorithm training and validation for identification of endometrial CD138+ cells in infertility-associated conditions; polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and recurrent implantation failure (RIF)

dc.contributor.authorLee Seungbaek
dc.contributor.authorArffman Riikka K.
dc.contributor.authorKomsi Elina K.
dc.contributor.authorLindgren Outi
dc.contributor.authorKemppainen Janette A.
dc.contributor.authorMetsola Hanna
dc.contributor.authorRossi Henna-Riikka
dc.contributor.authorAhtikoski Anne
dc.contributor.authorKask Keiu
dc.contributor.authorSaare Merli
dc.contributor.authorSalumets Andres
dc.contributor.authorPiltonen Terhi T.
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.converis.publication-id393426197
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/393426197
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T22:26:44Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T22:26:44Z
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endometrial CD138+ plasma cells serve as a diagnostic biomarker for endometrial inflammation, and their elevated occurrence correlates positively with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Infertility-related conditions like polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and recurrent implantation failure (RIF) are closely associated with systemic and local chronic inflammatory status, wherein endometrial CD138+ plasma cell accumulation could also contribute to endometrial pathology. Current methods for quantifying CD138+ cells typically involve laborious and time-consuming microscopic assessments of only a few random areas from a slide. These methods have limitations in accurately representing the entire slide and are susceptible to significant biases arising from intra- and interobserver variations. Implementing artificial intelligence (AI) for CD138+ cell identification could enhance the accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability of analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here, an AI algorithm was developed to identify CD138+ plasma cells within endometrial tissue. The AI model comprised two layers of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). CNN1 was trained to segment epithelium and stroma across 28,363 mm<sup>2</sup> (2.56 mm<sup>2</sup> of epithelium and 24.87 mm<sup>2</sup> of stroma), while CNN2 was trained to distinguish stromal cells based on CD138 staining, encompassing 7345 cells in the object layers (6942 CD138- cells and 403 CD138+ cells). The training and performance of the AI model were validated by three experienced pathologists. We collected 193 endometrial tissues from healthy controls (<em>n</em> = 73), women with PCOS (<em>n</em> = 91), and RIF patients (<em>n</em> = 29) and compared the CD138+ cell percentages based on cycle phases, ovulation status, and endometrial receptivity utilizing the AI model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI algorithm consistently and reliably distinguished CD138- and CD138+ cells, with total error rates of 6.32% and 3.23%, respectively. During the training validation, there was a complete agreement between the decisions made by the pathologists and the AI algorithm, while the performance validation demonstrated excellent accuracy between the AI and human evaluation methods (intraclass correlation; 0.76, 95% confidence intervals; 0.36-0.93, <em>p</em> = 0.002) and a positive correlation (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient: 0.79, <em>p</em> < 0.01). In the AI analysis, the AI model revealed higher CD138+ cell percentages in the proliferative phase (PE) endometrium compared to the secretory phase or anovulatory PCOS endometrium, irrespective of PCOS diagnosis. Interestingly, CD138+ percentages differed according to PCOS phenotype in the PE (<em>p</em> = 0.03). On the other hand, the receptivity status had no impact on the cell percentages in RIF samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings emphasize the potential and accuracy of the AI algorithm in detecting endometrial CD138+ plasma cells, offering distinct advantages over manual inspection, such as rapid analysis of whole slide images, reduction of intra- and interobserver variations, sparing the valuable time of trained specialists, and consistent productivity. This supports the application of AI technology to help clinical decision-making, for example, in understanding endometrial cycle phase-related dynamics, as well as different reproductive disorders.</p>
dc.identifier.eissn2153-3539
dc.identifier.jour-issn2229-5089
dc.identifier.olddbid202178
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/185205
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/46284
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100380
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082789703
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline217 Medical engineeringen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3123 Gynaecology and paediatricsen_GB
dc.okm.discipline217 Lääketieteen tekniikkafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline3123 Naisten- ja lastentauditfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.publisher.countryIndiaen_GB
dc.publisher.countryIntiafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeIN
dc.relation.articlenumber100380
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100380
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Pathology Informatics
dc.relation.volume15
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/185205
dc.titleAI-algorithm training and validation for identification of endometrial CD138+ cells in infertility-associated conditions; polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and recurrent implantation failure (RIF)
dc.year.issued2024

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
1-s2.0-S2153353924000191-main.pdf
Size:
1.27 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format