Implications of Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) to Company Network Collaboration

dc.contributor.authorJokinen, Leena
dc.contributor.authorHarju, Noora
dc.contributor.authorKinnunen, Kalle
dc.contributor.authorHänninen, Saara
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tulevaisuuden tutkimuskeskus|en=Finland Futures Research Centre (FFRC)|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.36987167164
dc.converis.publication-id491313140
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/491313140
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T02:24:29Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T02:24:29Z
dc.description.abstract<p>This paper examines the collaborative dynamics within a European cruise shipbuilding company network, with a particular focus on sustainable development (SD) initiatives and compliance with the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Shipbuilding is characterized by highly complex supplier networks, posing challenges for CSRD implementation, particularly in reporting indirect (Scope 3) greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) across the value chain. The mandatory inclusion of Scope 3 emissions requires companies to account for previously overlooked activities, posing significant resource demands due to the complexity of global supply chains. The findings highlight challenges in the preparedness of case companies for CSRD-compliant Scope 3 emissions reporting, particularly regarding necessary operational and collaborative changes. Network analysis reveals that the case company network is loosely connected, with limited interorganizational SD initiatives. While the lead company occupies a central position in advancing sustainability efforts, the overall network structure exhibits weak coordination. Despite a social framework that facilitates information exchange, the network demonstrates limited capacity to leverage collective resources for integrated reporting, development, and innovation. The findings suggest that a more open and balanced network structure, coupled with coordinated collaboration, is essential for effectively addressing CSRD requirements. Strengthening transparency, fostering commitment, and enhancing joint SD initiatives may provide strategic advantages and contribute to long-term business sustainability and renewal.<br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn2632-6582
dc.identifier.jour-issn2632-6582
dc.identifier.olddbid209050
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/192077
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/38686
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20250018
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082788192
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorJokinen, Leena
dc.okm.discipline218 Environmental engineeringen_GB
dc.okm.discipline511 Economicsen_GB
dc.okm.discipline218 Ympäristötekniikkafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline511 Kansantaloustiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherHapres
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.20900/jsr20250018
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Sustainability Research
dc.relation.volume7
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/192077
dc.titleImplications of Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) to Company Network Collaboration
dc.year.issued2025

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
JSR_1711.pdf
Size:
701.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format