Techno-economic analysis on optimizing the value of photovoltaic electricity in a high-latitude location

dc.contributor.authorJouttijärvi Sami
dc.contributor.authorKarttunen Lauri
dc.contributor.authorRanta Samuli
dc.contributor.authorMiettunen Kati
dc.contributor.organizationfi=materiaalitekniikka|en=Materials Engineering|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.80931480620
dc.converis.publication-id387105923
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/387105923
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T01:50:12Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T01:50:12Z
dc.description.abstractThis study performs a techno-economic analysis of different photovoltaic (PV) systems suitable for detached houses in high-latitude locations and quantifies the key economic indicators affecting their competitiveness. Residential PV systems providing different temporal power production profiles are compared, accounting for the electricity price variations in the day-ahead market and the possibility of self-consuming the produced electricity. The procedure allows novel and comprehensive case study analysis that captures PV production, self-consumption, and dynamic electricity pricing, ultimately revealing the value of the produced PV electricity. This procedure is applied to a hundred case studies representing single-family houses with different PV systems, electricity load profiles, and electricity contracts. Vertical East-West mounted bifacial panels (VBPV) reached superior performance, with 9.1% higher overall production (with 2019 weather data) and 7.4%–10.9% higher economic value (with 2019 and 2022 electricity price data) for the produced PV electricity compared with monofacial PV. Thus, VBPV is an excellent choice for households economically, but the availability of suitable installation sites in the urban environment limits the possibility of its utilization. The economic value of PV electricity strongly correlates with self-consumed electricity due to avoided transmission fees and taxes, and a significant drop in total production causes only a minor reduction in value if the amount of self-consumed electricity remains similar. Thus, for a small-scale producer who orients the panels toward the East and the West instead of the South with a 45° tilt, the economic loss is significantly smaller (even as low as 12.6%) than the production loss (23.2%).
dc.identifier.eissn1872-9118
dc.identifier.jour-issn0306-2619
dc.identifier.olddbid208132
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/191159
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/57528
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122924
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082787889
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorJouttijärvi, Sami
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKarttunen, Lauri
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorMiettunen, Kati
dc.okm.discipline214 Mechanical engineeringen_GB
dc.okm.discipline216 Materials engineeringen_GB
dc.okm.discipline214 Kone- ja valmistustekniikkafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline216 Materiaalitekniikkafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.articlenumber122924
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122924
dc.relation.ispartofjournalApplied Energy
dc.relation.volume361
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/191159
dc.titleTechno-economic analysis on optimizing the value of photovoltaic electricity in a high-latitude location
dc.year.issued2024

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
1-s2.0-S0306261924003076-main.pdf
Size:
13.32 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format