A unifying theoretical framework for conservation flagships

dc.contributor.authorJarić, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorCrowley, Sarah L.
dc.contributor.authorJeschke, Jonathan M.
dc.contributor.authorArbieu, Ugo
dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira Caetano
dc.contributor.authorGabriel Henrique
dc.contributor.authorCorreia, Ricardo A.
dc.contributor.authorKamdar, Arjun
dc.contributor.authorLadle, Richard J.
dc.contributor.authorMammola, Stefano
dc.contributor.authorRoll, Uri
dc.contributor.authorVeríssimo, Diogo
dc.contributor.organizationfi=Turun yliopiston biodiversiteettiyksikkö|en=Biodiversity Unit of the University of Turku|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.85536774202
dc.converis.publication-id498660271
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/498660271
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T03:10:53Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T03:10:53Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Conservation flagships are an effective approach to mobilize support for conservation. The flagship concept has recently been expanded beyond species, to include also fleets, protected areas, ecosystems, individuals, and events. Here, we present a unifying framework of flagship categories and their use, provide a roadmap for flagship selection, and give recommendations for their use in conservation practice. We also propose the flexible encompassing term ‘flagship entity’, broadly defined as a unique and recognizable entity that can be easily communicated for conservation purposes. Flagship entities are characterized by their biological and ecological organization level, temporal state, geographical reach, current level of use, and effectiveness. Flagship selection should be driven by sound knowledge and a clear understanding of the target audience’s conscious and subconscious preferences and its intended use. Further work is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of various flagship categories and concepts, and the positive and negative economic outcomes of flagship strategies.<br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn1873-2917
dc.identifier.jour-issn0006-3207
dc.identifier.olddbid210318
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/193345
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/51287
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111199
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082788637
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHenriques Correia, Ricardo
dc.okm.discipline1172 Environmental sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ecology, evolutionary biologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1172 Ympäristötiedefi_FI
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ekologia, evoluutiobiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA2 Scientific Article
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.articlenumber111199
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111199
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBiological Conservation
dc.relation.volume308
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/193345
dc.titleA unifying theoretical framework for conservation flagships
dc.year.issued2025

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
correia_2025_a_unifying.pdf
Size:
4.81 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format