From Imposter Syndrome to Heroic Tales: Doctoral Students’ Backgrounds, Study Aims, and Experiences

dc.contributor.authorHanna Nori
dc.contributor.authorMarja Peura
dc.contributor.authorArto Jauhiainen
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kasvatustieteiden laitos|en=Department of Education|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.56860088444
dc.converis.publication-id49326186
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/49326186
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T12:34:42Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T12:34:42Z
dc.description.abstractAim/Purpose<br />The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive picture of doctoral students’ dissertation journeys using Finland as a case country. More specifically, the article examines (1) the students’ backgrounds, (2) their study motives and experiences, and (3) whether or not these elements are related.<br />Background<br />Despite the massification of higher education (HE), there is a shortage of detailed mixed-methods studies about PhD students’ backgrounds and their experiences of doctoral study. Existing research does not give a clear indication of the extent to which home background is reflected in PhD applications and whether or not that background is related to the subsequent experience of doctoral students.<br />Methodology<br />This paper is based on both quantitative and qualitative data. We utilize a person-based register (N = 18,585) and a survey (n = 1,651). Our main methods are k-means cluster analysis, t-test, and directed content analysis. Our theoretical approach is Bourdieuian. We use the concept of doctoral capital when evaluating the backgrounds, resources, and success of PhD students through the dissertation process.<br />Contribution<br />This study uses a mixed-methods approach and is the first to incorporate quantitative data about the entire doctoral student population in Finland. In addition, open-ended responses in the survey make the PhD students’ own experiences visible. By approaching our research subject through a mixed methods lens, we aim to create a comprehensive understanding about their dissertation journeys.<br />With this study, we also contribute to the debate initiated by Falconer and Djokic (2019). They found that age, race, and socioeconomic status (SES) do not influence academic self-efficacy and academic self-handicapping behaviors in doctoral students. However, in this study, a link was found between the PhD students’ backgrounds (age and parents’ SES), and their study aims and experiences.<br />
dc.format.pagerange517
dc.format.pagerange539
dc.identifier.eissn1556-8865
dc.identifier.jour-issn1556-8881
dc.identifier.olddbid177451
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/160545
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/33698
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.28945/4637
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042825290
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorNori, Hanna
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorPeura, Marja
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorJauhiainen, Arto
dc.okm.discipline516 Educational sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline516 Kasvatustieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherInforming Science Institute
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.doi10.28945/4637
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational Journal of Doctoral Studies
dc.relation.volume15
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/160545
dc.titleFrom Imposter Syndrome to Heroic Tales: Doctoral Students’ Backgrounds, Study Aims, and Experiences
dc.year.issued2020

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
IJDSv15p517-539Nori6344.pdf
Size:
759.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher´s pdf