Pair-bond and survival in historical population: Marriage, widowhood, and social class

dc.contributor.authorPettay, Jenni E.
dc.contributor.authorLahdenperä, Mirkka
dc.contributor.authorTanskanen, Antti O.
dc.contributor.authorLummaa, Virpi
dc.contributor.authorDanielsbacka, Mirkka
dc.contributor.organizationfi=taloussosiologia|en=Economic Sociology|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=ekologia ja evoluutiobiologia|en=Ecology and Evolutionary Biology |
dc.contributor.organizationfi=INVEST tutkimuskeskus ja lippulaiva|en=INVEST Research Flagship Centre|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.11531668876
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.20415010352
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.82939713796
dc.converis.publication-id524404570
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/524404570
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-05T20:13:42Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Marriage is widely associated with improved health and longevity, but spousal death significantly heightens immediate mortality risk, a phenomenon known as the “widowhood effect.” While these relationships are well-documented in modern populations, their prevalence in historical societies with extended family structures is less understood. Using church book records from Finland (1730–1910) and discrete-time event models, this study examined the survival probabilities of 11,892 individuals aged 40–90 across five marital statuses, with attention to socioeconomic status. In line with previous studies, we found large detrimental short-term widowhood effect. Long-term widowhood effect was smaller, and lower in women compared to men. Survival after remarriage was similar to first-time marriage. The survival of individuals who had never married did not differ from those who were married, suggesting that more communal living may have buffered against the possible negative effects of being single.<br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn2589-0042
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/61619
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.115759
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2026060564517
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorPettay, Jenni
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLahdenperä, Mirkka
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorTanskanen, Antti
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLummaa, Virpi
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDanielsbacka, Mirkka
dc.okm.discipline5141 Sociologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline5141 Sosiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ecology, evolutionary biologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ekologia, evoluutiobiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.publisher.countryNetherlandsen_GB
dc.publisher.countryAlankomaatfi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeNL
dc.relation.articlenumber115759
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.isci.2026.115759
dc.relation.ispartofjournaliScience
dc.relation.issue5
dc.relation.volume29
dc.titlePair-bond and survival in historical population: Marriage, widowhood, and social class
dc.year.issued2026

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
1-s2.0-S258900422601134X-main.pdf
Size:
2.71 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format