Map Matching by Using Inertial Sensors – Literature Review

dc.contributor.authorMika Kaustinen
dc.contributor.authorMika Taskinen
dc.contributor.authorTero Säntti
dc.contributor.authorJukka Arvo
dc.contributor.authorTeijo Lehtonen
dc.contributor.organizationfi=Technology Research Center TRC|en=Technology Research Center TRC|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.58905910210
dc.contributor.organization-code2609060
dc.converis.publication-id1602398
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/1602398
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T14:23:47Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T14:23:47Z
dc.description.abstract<p> This literature review aims to clarify what is known about map matching by<br /> using inertial sensors and what are the requirements for map matching, inertial<br /> sensors, placement and possible complementary position technology. The target<br /> is to develop a wearable location system that can position itself within a complex<br /> construction environment automatically with the aid of an accurate building model.<br /> The wearable location system should work on a tablet computer which is running<br /> an augmented reality (AR) solution and is capable of track and visualize 3D-CAD<br /> models in real environment. The wearable location system is needed to support the<br /> system in initialization of the accurate camera pose calculation and automatically<br /> finding the right location in the 3D-CAD model. One type of sensor which does seem<br /> applicable to people tracking is inertial measurement unit (IMU). The IMU sensors<br /> in aerospace applications, based on laser based gyroscopes, are big but provide a<br /> very accurate position estimation with a limited drift. Small and light units such<br /> as those based on Micro-Electro-Mechanical (MEMS) sensors are becoming very<br /> popular, but they have a signicant bias and therefore suffer from large drifts and<br /> require method for calibration like map matching. The system requires very little<br /> fixed infrastructure, the monetary cost is proportional to the number of users, rather<br /> than to the coverage area as is the case for traditional absolute indoor location<br /> systems.</p>
dc.identifier.isbn978-951-29-6190-0
dc.identifier.issn2341-8028
dc.identifier.olddbid188015
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/171109
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/43456
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042714199
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKaustinen, Mika
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorTaskinen, Mika
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSäntti, Tero
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorArvo, Jukka
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLehtonen, Teijo
dc.okm.discipline213 Electronic, automation and communications engineering, electronicsen_GB
dc.okm.discipline213 Sähkö-, automaatio- ja tietoliikennetekniikka, elektroniikkafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityDomestic publication
dc.okm.typeD4 Scientific Report
dc.publisherTurun yliopisto
dc.publisher.countryFinlanden_GB
dc.publisher.countrySuomifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeFI
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUniversity of Turku Technical Reports
dc.relation.volume6
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/171109
dc.titleMap Matching by Using Inertial Sensors – Literature Review
dc.year.issued2015

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
MM by using inertial sensors.pdf
Size:
1.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format