Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks

dc.contributor.authorElisa Ryyppö
dc.contributor.authorEnrico Glerean
dc.contributor.authorElvira Brattico
dc.contributor.authorJari Saramäki
dc.contributor.authorOnerva Korhonen
dc.contributor.organizationfi=PET-keskus|en=Turku PET Centre|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.14646305228
dc.converis.publication-id37115563
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/37115563
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T13:45:07Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T13:45:07Z
dc.description.abstractThe properties of functional brain networks strongly depend on how their nodes are chosen. Commonly, nodes are defined by Regions of Interest (ROIs), predetermined groupings of fMRI measurement voxels. Earlier, we demonstrated that the functional homogeneity of ROIs, captured by their spatial consistency, varies widely across ROIs in commonly used brain atlases. Here, we ask how ROIs behave as nodes of dynamic brain networks. To this end, we use two measures: spatiotemporal consistency measures changes in spatial consistency across time and network turnover quantifies the changes in the local network structure around an ROI. We find that spatial consistency varies non-uniformly in space and time, which is reflected in the variation of spatiotemporal consistency across ROIs. Furthermore, we see time-dependent changes in the network neighborhoods of the ROIs, reflected in high network turnover. Network turnover is nonuniformly distributed across ROIs: ROIs with high spatiotemporal consistency have low network turnover. Finally, we reveal that there is rich voxel-level correlation structure inside ROIs. Because the internal structure and the connectivity of ROIs vary in time, the common approach of using static node definitions may be surprisingly inaccurate. Therefore, network neuroscience would greatly benefit from node definition strategies tailored for dynamical networks.
dc.format.pagerange513
dc.format.pagerange535
dc.identifier.eissn2472-1751
dc.identifier.jour-issn2472-1751
dc.identifier.olddbid184071
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/167165
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/45587
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/full/10.1162/netn_a_00047
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042720441
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorGlerean, Enrico
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3112 Neurosciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3112 Neurotieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherMIT PRESS
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.doi10.1162/netn_a_00047
dc.relation.ispartofjournalNetwork Neuroscience
dc.relation.issue4
dc.relation.volume2
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/167165
dc.titleRegions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks
dc.year.issued2018

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks.pdf
Size:
3.87 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's PDF