Foraging preference of barnacle geese on endophytic tall and red fescues

dc.contributor.authorKoski TM
dc.contributor.authorSaikkonen K
dc.contributor.authorKlemola T
dc.contributor.authorHelander M
dc.contributor.organizationfi=Turun yliopiston biodiversiteettiyksikkö|en=Biodiversity Unit of the University of Turku|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=ekologia ja evoluutiobiologia|en=Ecology and Evolutionary Biology |
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.20415010352
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.85536774202
dc.converis.publication-id44095386
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/44095386
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T13:46:34Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T13:46:34Z
dc.description.abstractMany grasses (Poaceae) have symbiotic fungal endophytes, which affect livestock by producing unpalatable or harmful secondary compounds. Less is known about the repelling effects of fungal endophytes on avian grazers despite potential wildlife management implications. Herbivorous goose (Branta spp.) species may become a nuisance in recreational use areas via fecal littering. Planting these areas with grasses that avian grazers avoid may help mitigate this damage. In 2016, we studied the foraging preference of the barnacle geese (B. leucopsis) with endophytic (E+) or endophyte-free (E-) red fescue (Festuca rubra) and/or tall fescue (Schedonorus phoenix) in 2 sites in Finland that had a history of nuisance geese damage. In the high grazing pressure site, we planted both grass species, while in the low grazing pressure site only tall fescue was used. Geese preference was measured as the percentage of the area grazed, the height of the residual grass grazed, and the number of fecal droppings in the grass plots. Geese foraging did not differ between E- and E+ grasses, but red fescues were preferred over tall fescues. This supports previous findings that tall fescues or other coarse species could reduce the attractiveness of recreational areas to geese.
dc.format.pagerange331
dc.format.pagerange343
dc.identifier.eissn2155-3874
dc.identifier.jour-issn2155-3858
dc.identifier.olddbid184236
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/167330
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/41653
dc.identifier.urlhttps://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol13/iss2/17
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042823422
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKoski, Tuuli
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSaikkonen, Kari
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKlemola, Tero
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHelander, Marjo
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ecology, evolutionary biologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1183 Plant biology, microbiology, virologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ekologia, evoluutiobiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline1183 Kasvibiologia, mikrobiologia, virologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherJACK H BERRYMAN INST
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.doi10.26077/tdb4-fb45
dc.relation.ispartofjournalHuman-Wildlife Interactions
dc.relation.issue2
dc.relation.volume13
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/167330
dc.titleForaging preference of barnacle geese on endophytic tall and red fescues
dc.year.issued2019

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Koski et al. 2019 Human-Wildlife Interactions.pdf
Size:
890.57 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's PDF