A randomized controlled trial of empathetic refutational learning with health care professionals

dc.contributor.authorHolford, Dawn
dc.contributor.authorMäki, Karl O.
dc.contributor.authorKarlsson, Linda C.
dc.contributor.authorLewandowsky, Stephan
dc.contributor.authorGould, Virginia C.
dc.contributor.authorSoveri, Anna
dc.contributor.organizationfi=Turun ihmistieteiden tutkijakollegium (TIAS)|en=Turku Institute for Advanced Studies (TIAS)|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=psykiatria|en=Psychiatry|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=psykologia|en=Psychology|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.15586825505
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.16217176722
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.78639161450
dc.converis.publication-id491408073
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/491408073
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T22:59:24Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T22:59:24Z
dc.description.abstract<p><b>Background </b>Health care professionals are in a key position to promote vaccinations. However, consulting vaccine-hesitant patients can be difficult, especially when patients bring up anti-vaccination arguments. Whereas prior research has identified essential skills for refuting anti-vaccination arguments, little is known about how to acquire these skills. Our aim was to determine if empathetic refutational interview text scenarios help health care professionals build confidence and abilities in countering anti-vaccination arguments.<br></p><p><b>Methods </b>We conducted an online randomized controlled experiment with UK and Finnish health care professionals in which we randomly assigned them to an empathetic refutational interview group (<i>n</i> = 167) or a control group (<i>n</i> = 180). Participants in the empathetic refutational interview group were presented with examples of the empathetic refutational interview approach, which encompasses the identification of attitude roots, affirmations, corrections of misconceptions, and provision of facts. Control group participants received a standard facts-based approach. We examined posttest use of empathetic refutational interview techniques and pre- and posttest perceived difficulty of refuting anti-vaccination arguments.<br></p><p><b>Results </b>Participants in the empathetic refutational interview group used more empathetic affirmations than control group participants. The empathetic refutational interview group and the control group did not differ significantly in how often they explicitly tried to identify attitude roots, correct misconceptions, and provide vaccination facts, nor in how difficult they found anti-vaccination arguments to be to refute.<br></p><p><b>Conclusions </b>Brief empathetic refutational interview text scenarios can increase health care professionals' use of affirmations when discussing vaccines with patients. Additional materials are needed to efficiently teach refutations of attitude roots.<br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2458
dc.identifier.jour-issn1471-2458
dc.identifier.olddbid203168
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/186195
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/50823
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21787-4
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025081883265
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorMäki, Otto
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKarlsson, Linda
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKarlsson, Linda
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKarlsson, Linda
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSoveri, Anna
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSoveri, Anna
dc.okm.discipline515 Psychologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline515 Psykologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherBMC
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.publisher.placeLONDON
dc.relation.articlenumber583
dc.relation.doi10.1186/s12889-025-21787-4
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBMC Public Health
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume25
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/186195
dc.titleA randomized controlled trial of empathetic refutational learning with health care professionals
dc.year.issued2025

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
s12889-025-21787-4.pdf
Size:
2.44 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format