Learning and generalization of vowel duration with production training: behavioral results

dc.contributor.authorAntti Saloranta
dc.contributor.authorPaavo Alku
dc.contributor.authorMaija S. Peltola
dc.contributor.organizationfi=Fonetiikka|en=Phonetics|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kieli- ja käännöstieteiden laitos|en=School of Languages and Translation Studies|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.71862654259
dc.contributor.organization-code2602100
dc.converis.publication-id28579135
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/28579135
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T21:37:19Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T21:37:19Z
dc.description.abstract<p>The purpose of this study was to determine whether a short listen-and-repeat training paradigm can be used to train vowel duration discrimination and production, and whether any learning effects are transferred to an untrained vowel or a non-linguistic sound. Similar training has previously been used to train vowel quality contrasts to young adults and children, with results showing up both in behavioral and psychophysiological measurements. Unlike vowel quality, segment duration can be considered to be a suprasegmental feature that is not directly dependent on any other acoustic feature of the sounds being trained. It is therefore plausible that it can be learned a separate skill and generalize to untrained segments, and even non-linguistic sounds. Participants were 18-30-year-old healthy adults with normal hearing,<br />who were not native Finnish speakers and had spent little time in Finland. The stimuli were semisynthetic Finnish pseudoword pairs /tite/-/ti:te/ and /tote/-/to:te/. A sinusoidal tone pair served as the non-linguistic stimulus. The behavioral measurements employed in the study were an oddball discrimination<br />task for all three stimulus pairs, and a listen-and-repeat production task for both of the vowel pairs. No feedback was given. The experiment was conducted in three sessions over three days. The first two consecutive days consisted of baseline measurements for all the stimuli and four blocks of production training. The third day, taking place 1-2 weeks after the second, consisted of full progress measurements. The results show that the training did induce changes in discrimination sensitivity and production of the trained length contrasts, though not all effects remained at the end of the experiment. This suggests that while the processing mechanisms related to the processing of duration contrasts are somewhat separated from the processing of vowel quality, it seems that they can be accessed with this kind of training.<br /></p>
dc.format.pagerange67
dc.format.pagerange87
dc.identifier.jour-issn1407-1932
dc.identifier.olddbid200753
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/183780
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/47145
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042718008
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorPeltola, Maija
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSaloranta, Antti
dc.okm.discipline6121 Languagesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline6121 Kielitieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherLatvian Language Institute of the University of Turku
dc.publisher.countryFinlanden_GB
dc.publisher.countrySuomifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeFI
dc.relation.ispartofjournalLinguistica Lettica
dc.relation.volume25
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/183780
dc.titleLearning and generalization of vowel duration with production training: behavioral results
dc.year.issued2017

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Saloranta_Lettica_2017.pdf
Size:
438.8 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format