Morphological Comparison of Residual Ridge in Impression for Removable Partial Denture between Digital and Conventional Techniques: A Preliminary In-Vivo Study

dc.contributor.authorIshioka Yurika
dc.contributor.authorWada Junichiro
dc.contributor.authorKim Eung-Yeol
dc.contributor.authorSakamoto Kazuki
dc.contributor.authorArai Yuki
dc.contributor.authorMurakami Natsuko
dc.contributor.authorYamazaki Toshiki
dc.contributor.authorTakakusaki Kensuke
dc.contributor.authorHayama Hironari
dc.contributor.authorUtsumi Miona
dc.contributor.authorInukai Shusuke
dc.contributor.authorWakabayashi Noriyuki
dc.contributor.organizationfi=hammaslääketieteen laitos|en=Institute of Dentistry|
dc.contributor.organization-code2607500
dc.converis.publication-id380574961
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/380574961
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T21:47:03Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T21:47:03Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Although digital impression using an intraoral scanner (IOS) has been applied for removable partial denture (RPD) fabrication, it is still unclear how the morphology of a residual ridge recorded by digital impression would differ from that recorded by conventional impression. This in vivo study investigated the morphological difference in the recorded residual ridge between digital and conventional impressions. Vertical and horizontal displacements (VD and HD) in residual ridges recorded by digital and conventional impressions were assessed in 22 participants (15 female; mean age 78.2 years) based on the morphology of the tissue surface of in-use RPD. Additionally, the mucosal thickness of the residual ridge was recorded using an ultrasound diagnostic device. VD and HD were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and the correlation of mucosal thickness with VD and HD was analyzed using Spearman’s <em>ρ</em>. The VD of digital impression was significantly greater than that of a conventional impression (<em>p</em> = 0.031), while no significant difference was found in HD (<em>p</em> = 0.322). Meanwhile, the mucosal thickness showed no significant correlation with the recorded morphology of the residual ridge, regardless of the impression techniques. It was concluded that the digital impression would result in a greater displacement in the height of the residual ridge from the morphology of in-use RPD than the conventional impression.<br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn2077-0383
dc.identifier.olddbid201113
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/184140
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/47538
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/22/7103
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082789327
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorWada, Junichiro
dc.okm.discipline313 Dentistryen_GB
dc.okm.discipline313 Hammaslääketieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.publisher.countrySwitzerlanden_GB
dc.publisher.countrySveitsifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeCH
dc.publisher.placeBasel
dc.relation.articlenumber7103
dc.relation.doi10.3390/jcm12227103
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
dc.relation.issue22
dc.relation.volume12
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/184140
dc.titleMorphological Comparison of Residual Ridge in Impression for Removable Partial Denture between Digital and Conventional Techniques: A Preliminary In-Vivo Study
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
jcm-12-07103.pdf
Size:
2.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format