A Country of White Lilies: Inter-Imperial Nation-Making and Development from the Russian Empire's Periphery to Post-Ottoman Turkey

dc.contributor.authorBavbek N. Yasemin
dc.contributor.authorKorhonen Juho Topias
dc.contributor.organizationfi=Turun ihmistieteiden tutkijakollegium (TIAS)|en=Turku Institute for Advanced Studies (TIAS)|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=sosiologia|en=Sociology|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.45485937705
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.78639161450
dc.converis.publication-id387227030
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/387227030
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T00:49:37Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T00:49:37Z
dc.description.abstract<p>In this article, we investigate the reasons behind the puzzling enthusiastic reception of a book about Finland's national development by Turkish nationalist intellectuals in the early Republic of Turkey. Published in Turkish in 1928, the developmental model laid out in Petrov's <i>The Country of White Lilies</i> resonated with the Turkish intelligentsia and has remained a popular book in Turkey throughout the twentieth century, and even today. First, we compare the fictionalized developmental model presented by Petrov in his book with Finnish development under the Russian Empire, before its independence in 1917. Second, we show that this reception was largely based on a comparison of Turkey and Finland's geopolitical positions in global imperial politics, and a constructed racial affinity between the two nations in the minds of Turkish readers. Third, we argue that this national developmental model served three ideological purposes; distancing the Turkish Republic from the Ottoman Empire, showing the developmental capacity of nations outside the linear and paternalistic developmental model proposed by Western European empires, and last, presenting a model that glosses over Ottoman-Turkish state violence and ethnic cleansing, as well as democratic processes, as irrelevant to considerations of progress and development. Finally, we discuss the implications of our study for re-evaluating the sociological literature on nation formation, largely taking its "model cases"(Krause 2021) from the Western European experience, through a more encompassing inter-imperial approach (Doyle 2014).<br></p>
dc.format.pagerange417
dc.format.pagerange442
dc.identifier.eissn1475-2999
dc.identifier.jour-issn0010-4175
dc.identifier.olddbid206487
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/189514
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/46899
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417523000506
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082787374
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKorhonen, Juho
dc.okm.discipline5141 Sociologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline5141 Sosiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.1017/S0010417523000506
dc.relation.ispartofjournalComparative Studies in Society and History
dc.relation.issue2
dc.relation.volume66
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/189514
dc.titleA Country of White Lilies: Inter-Imperial Nation-Making and Development from the Russian Empire's Periphery to Post-Ottoman Turkey
dc.year.issued2024

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
a-country-of-white-lilies-inter-imperial-nation-making-and-development-from-the-russian-empires-periphery-to-post-ottoman-turkey.pdf
Size:
911.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format