Actantial construction of career guidance in parliament of Finland’s education policy debates 1967–2020

dc.contributor.authorVarjo Janne
dc.contributor.authorKalalahti Mira
dc.contributor.authorHooley Tristram
dc.contributor.organizationfi=Turun ihmistieteiden tutkijakollegium (TIAS)|en=Turku Institute for Advanced Studies (TIAS)|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kasvatustieteiden laitos|en=Department of Education|
dc.contributor.organization-code2601830
dc.contributor.organization-code2604100
dc.converis.publication-id67179374
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/67179374
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-27T12:16:57Z
dc.date.available2022-10-27T12:16:57Z
dc.description.abstract<p> In this paper we examine the objectives and meanings of the career guidance provided in comprehensive education as set out in discussions in the Parliament of Finland. We approach the topic through an exploration of parliamentary sessions concerning three major legislative proposals for reforming compulsory education in Finland.<br></p><p><br>The premise is that the parliamentary discussions concerning guidance provided in comprehensive education reflect the rationalities that underpin guidance in different eras in Finland and elsewhere. Examining these rationalities provides a way to explore the principles which frame career guidance policy in Finland. Using the<br>actantial model as a methodological tool, the analysis aims to discover the actantial positions in the  parliamentary discussions and the interactions that emerge between these.<br></p><p><br>The various actantial narratives demonstrate the way in which guidance is influenced by wider ideological trends. The actantial analysis portrays a shift from the more structural corporatist approaches of the 1960s when the object of guidance was to fulfil the needs of society, towards more third way individualism in<br>1990s. The current reform of 2020 to extend compulsory education and reinforce guidance may represent some return to more structural approaches. <br></p>
dc.format.pagerange1009
dc.format.pagerange1027
dc.identifier.eissn1464-5106
dc.identifier.jour-issn0268-0939
dc.identifier.olddbid174430
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/157524
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/34237
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02680939.2021.1971772
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021110253330
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKalalahti, Mira
dc.okm.discipline516 Educational sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline516 Kasvatustieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.1080/02680939.2021.1971772
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Education Policy
dc.relation.issue6
dc.relation.volume37
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/157524
dc.titleActantial construction of career guidance in parliament of Finland’s education policy debates 1967–2020
dc.year.issued2022

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Actantial construction of career guidance in parliament of Finland s education policy debates 1967 2020.pdf
Size:
754.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's PDF