Revisiting the five problems of public sector organisations and reputation management—the perspective of higher education practitioners and ex-academics

dc.contributor.authorPäivikki Kuoppakangas
dc.contributor.authorKati Suomi
dc.contributor.authorJari Stenvall
dc.contributor.authorElias Pekkola
dc.contributor.authorJussi Kivistö
dc.contributor.authorTomi Kallio
dc.contributor.organizationfi=Porin yksikkö|en=Pori Unit|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.85476593059
dc.converis.publication-id40673300
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/40673300
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-27T12:08:25Z
dc.date.available2022-10-27T12:08:25Z
dc.description.abstract<p>The extant literature has identified five problems related to public sector organisations and their reputation management: politics, consistency, charisma, uniqueness and excellence. This study examines whether and how the problems of reputation management occur in public higher education by collecting qualitative data from 40 interviews. The study sheds light on the perceptions of a group that has been largely neglected in previous studies: namely, doctorates who have exited academia, or ex-academics. In addition to ex-academics, interviewees also included their employers and university leadership. The analysis follows a thematic qualitative approach with an abductive logic. The study provides empirical evidence of the content of the problems in higher education and discusses recent related transformations in higher education. The findings show that, in terms of reputation management, the most challenging matters appear to be knowledge transfer and the applicability of research to practice. These challenges are cross-cutting and apparent from different angles across all five problems of reputation management. This study contributes to the academic literature on reputation management in the public sector by applying prior conceptual categorizations and employing a comprehensive set of empirical data with a fresh perspective. The study presents implications for higher education policy makers and managers and emphasises the need for university management to minimise the duality between different types of workers, as this duality threatens university reputations in general and consistency in particular.<br /></p>
dc.format.pagerange147
dc.format.pagerange171
dc.identifier.eissn1865-1992
dc.identifier.jour-issn1865-1984
dc.identifier.olddbid173453
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/156547
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/31670
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12208-019-00223-5
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042824424
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSuomi, Kati
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKallio, Tomi
dc.okm.discipline512 Business and managementen_GB
dc.okm.discipline512 Liiketaloustiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.publisher.countryGermanyen_GB
dc.publisher.countrySaksafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeDE
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s12208-019-00223-5
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing
dc.relation.issue2-4
dc.relation.volume16
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/156547
dc.titleRevisiting the five problems of public sector organisations and reputation management—the perspective of higher education practitioners and ex-academics
dc.year.issued2019

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Kuoppakangas2019_Article_RevisitingTheFiveProblemsOfPub.pdf
Size:
475.9 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format