Building Better Models: Benchmarking Feature Extraction and Matching for Structure from Motion at Construction Sites

dc.contributor.authorCueto Zumaya
dc.contributor.authorCarlos Roberto
dc.contributor.authorCatalano, Iacopo
dc.contributor.authorPeña Queralta, Jorge
dc.contributor.organizationfi=robotiikka ja autonomiset järjestelmät|en=Robotics and Autonomous Systems|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.72785230805
dc.converis.publication-id457763687
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/457763687
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T02:55:39Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T02:55:39Z
dc.description.abstractThe popularity of Structure from Motion (SfM) techniques has significantly advanced 3D reconstruction in various domains, including construction site mapping. Central to SfM, is the feature extraction and matching process, which identifies and correlates keypoints across images. Previous benchmarks have assessed traditional and learning-based methods for these tasks but have not specifically focused on construction sites, often evaluating isolated components of the SfM pipeline. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of traditional methods (e.g., SIFT, AKAZE, ORB) and learning-based methods (e.g., D2-Net, DISK, R2D2, SuperPoint, SOSNet) within the SfM pipeline for construction site mapping. It also compares matching techniques, including SuperGlue and LightGlue, against traditional approaches such as nearest neighbor. Our findings demonstrate that deep learning-based methods such as DISK with LightGlue and SuperPoint with various matchers consistently outperform traditional methods like SIFT in both reconstruction quality and computational efficiency. Overall, the deep learning methods exhibited better adaptability to complex construction environments, leveraging modern hardware effectively, highlighting their potential for large-scale and real-time applications in construction site mapping. This benchmark aims to assist researchers in selecting the optimal combination of feature extraction and matching methods for SfM applications at construction sites.
dc.identifier.eissn2072-4292
dc.identifier.olddbid209935
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/192962
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/49934
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs16162974
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082788503
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorCueto Zumaya, Carlos
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorCatalano, Iacopo
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorPeña Queralta, Jorge
dc.okm.discipline213 Electronic, automation and communications engineering, electronicsen_GB
dc.okm.discipline213 Sähkö-, automaatio- ja tietoliikennetekniikka, elektroniikkafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.publisher.countrySwitzerlanden_GB
dc.publisher.countrySveitsifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeCH
dc.relation.articlenumber2974
dc.relation.doi10.3390/rs16162974
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRemote Sensing
dc.relation.issue16
dc.relation.volume16
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/192962
dc.titleBuilding Better Models: Benchmarking Feature Extraction and Matching for Structure from Motion at Construction Sites
dc.year.issued2024

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
remotesensing-16-02974.pdf
Size:
14.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format