Measuring the Usability and Quality of Explanations of a Machine Learning Web-Based Tool for Oral Tongue Cancer Prognostication

Abstract

Background: Machine learning models have been reported to assist in the proper management of cancer through accurate prognostication. Integrating such models as a web-based prognostic tool or calculator may help to improve cancer care and assist clinicians in making oral cancer management-related decisions. However, none of these models have been recommended in daily practices of oral cancer due to concerns related to machine learning methodologies and clinical implementation challenges. An instance of the concerns inherent to the science of machine learning is explainability. Objectives: This study measures the usability and explainability of a machine learning-based web prognostic tool that was designed for prediction of oral tongue cancer. We used the System Usability Scale (SUS) and System Causability Scale (SCS) to evaluate the explainability of the prognostic tool. In addition, we propose a framework for the evaluation of post hoc explainability of web-based prognostic tools. Methods: A SUS- and SCS-based questionnaire was administered amongst pathologists, radiologists, cancer and machine learning researchers and surgeons (n = 11) to evaluate the quality of explanations offered by the machine learning-based web prognostic tool to address the concern of explainability and usability of these models for cancer management. The examined web-based tool was developed by our group and is freely available online. Results: In terms of the usability of the web-based tool using the SUS, 81.9% (45.5% strongly agreed; 36.4% agreed) agreed that neither the support of a technical assistant nor a need to learn many things were required to use the web-based tool. Furthermore, 81.8% agreed that the evaluated web-based tool was not cumbersome to use (usability). The average score for the SCS (explainability) was 0.74. A total of 91.0% of the participants strongly agreed that the web-based tool can assist in clinical decision-making. These scores indicated that the examined web-based tool offers a significant level of usability and explanations about the outcome of interest. Conclusions: Integrating the trained and internally and externally validated model as a web-based tool or calculator is poised to offer an effective and easy approach towards the usage and acceptance of these models in the future daily practice. This approach has received significant attention in recent years. Thus, it is important that the usability and explainability of these models are measured to achieve such touted benefits. A usable and well-explained web-based tool further brings the use of these web-based tools closer to everyday clinical practices. Thus, the concept of more personalized and precision oncology can be achieved.