From lone wolves to serial cohabitors: Union trajectories to childlessness

dc.contributor.authorJalovaara Marika
dc.contributor.authorFasang Anette
dc.contributor.organizationfi=sosiologia|en=Sociology|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.45485937705
dc.converis.publication-id18170442
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/18170442
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T13:03:54Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T13:03:54Z
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Background</strong><br />Childlessness has increased in many European countries. Partnerships and parenthood are obviously closely related, but there is relatively little knowledge on how childlessness is linked to contemporary union dynamics involving high rates of separation and unmarried cohabitation.</p><p><strong>Objective</strong><br />To situate childlessness in longitudinal dynamics of union formation and stability, we take a holistic life-course approach to union trajectories that consist of states entered via the formation and dissolution of cohabitations and marriages. Concretely, we identify the typical union pathways (from age 18–39) of individuals that are childless at age 42.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong><br />We analyse register data on Finnish men and women born 1969 and 1970 (childless N=3,241) with sequence, cluster and multinomial logistic regression methods.</p><p><strong>Results</strong><br />Four typical union pathways were identified among the childless: Lone wolves (45%), characterised by never having entered a co-residential partnership, or just having entered a cohabitation near age 40; Briefly cohabited (25%), characterised by mostly living singly after a brief cohabitation spell, Cohabitors, often serial (19%), marked by typically discontinuous cohabitation; and Married (11%). Men, persons with a rural background, and the lowest and highest educated, are overrepresented among the Lone wolves childless.<br /> <br /><strong>Conclusion </strong><br />For the great majority of childless in our study cohorts, union trajectories are marked by either (almost) complete absence of co-residential unions, or fragmentary cohabitation histories.</p><p><strong>Contribution</strong><br />The study contributes to the literature by showing that union histories, including never partnering as well as cohabitation instability, are key for understanding contemporary childlessness.</p>
dc.identifier.olddbid179452
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/162546
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/37164
dc.identifier.urlhttp://wpsei.utu.fi/from-lone-wolves-to-serial-cohabiters-union-trajectories-to-childlessness/
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042716168
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorJalovaara, Marika
dc.okm.discipline5141 Sociologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline5141 Sosiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityDomestic publication
dc.okm.typeD4 Scientific Report
dc.publisherTurku Center for Welfare Research
dc.publisher.countryFinlanden_GB
dc.publisher.countrySuomifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeFI
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers on Social and Economic Issues
dc.relation.volume18/2016
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/162546
dc.titleFrom lone wolves to serial cohabitors: Union trajectories to childlessness
dc.year.issued2016

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
WPSEI 2016 Jalovaara Fasang.pdf
Size:
623.03 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format