Drivers of species knowledge across the tree of life

dc.contributor.authorMammola Stefano
dc.contributor.authorAdamo Martino
dc.contributor.authorAntić Dragan
dc.contributor.authorCalevo Jacopo
dc.contributor.authorCancellario Tommaso
dc.contributor.authorCardoso Pedro
dc.contributor.authorChamberlain Dan
dc.contributor.authorChialva Matteo
dc.contributor.authorDurucan Furkan
dc.contributor.authorFontaneto Diego
dc.contributor.authorGoncalves Duarte
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorSantini Luca
dc.contributor.authorRubio-López Iñigo
dc.contributor.authorSousa Ronaldo
dc.contributor.authorVillegas-Rios David
dc.contributor.authorVerdes Aida
dc.contributor.authorCorreia Ricardo A.
dc.contributor.organizationfi=Turun yliopiston biodiversiteettiyksikkö|en=Biodiversity Unit of the University of Turku|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.85536774202
dc.converis.publication-id380567302
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/380567302
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-21T13:44:02Z
dc.date.available2026-01-21T13:44:02Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Knowledge of biodiversity is unevenly distributed across the Tree of Life. In the long run, such disparity in awareness unbalances our understanding of life on Earth, influencing policy decisions and the allocation of research and conservation funding. We investigated how humans accumulate knowledge of biodiversity by searching for consistent relationships between scientific (number of publications) and societal (number of views in Wikipedia) interest, and species-level morphological, ecological, and sociocultural factors. Across a random selection of 3019 species spanning 29 Phyla/Divisions, we show that sociocultural factors are the most important correlates of scientific and societal interest in biodiversity, including the fact that a species is useful or harmful to humans, has a common name, and is listed in the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List. Furthermore, large-bodied, broadly distributed, and taxonomically unique species receive more scientific and societal attention, whereas colorfulness and phylogenetic proximity to humans correlate exclusively with societal attention. These results highlight a favoritism toward limited branches of the Tree of Life, and that scientific and societal priorities in biodiversity research broadly align. This suggests that we may be missing out on key species in our research and conservation agenda simply because they are not on our cultural radar.<br></p>
dc.identifier.jour-issn2050-084X
dc.identifier.olddbid213300
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/196318
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/55156
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88251.3
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082788836
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHenriques Correia, Ricardo
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ecology, evolutionary biologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ekologia, evoluutiobiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publishereLife Sciences Publications Ltd.
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.articlenumberRP88251
dc.relation.doi10.7554/eLife.88251.3
dc.relation.ispartofjournaleLife
dc.relation.volume12
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/196318
dc.titleDrivers of species knowledge across the tree of life
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
elife-88251-v1.pdf
Size:
1.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format