Inhibitory Control, Cognitive Flexibility, and the Production of Disfluencies in Children Who Do and Do Not Stutter

dc.contributor.authorPaphiti Maria
dc.contributor.authorTalias Michael A
dc.contributor.authorEggers Kurt
dc.contributor.organizationfi=logopedia|en=Speech-Language Pathology|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.46679761984
dc.converis.publication-id393448676
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/393448676
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T00:23:30Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T00:23:30Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Purpose: Differences in inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility between children who stutter (CWS) and children who do not stutter (CWNS) have been previously demonstrated. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether the previously reported inhibitory control- and cognitive flexibility-related performance costs for CWS are associated with the number of speech disfluencies that they produce.</p><p>Method: Participants were 19 CWS (Mage = 7.58 years, range: 6.08-9.17) and 19 CWNS matched on age and gender (Mage = 7.58 years, range: 6.08-9.33). Gamma regression models were used to investigate possible associations between performance costs in speed and accuracy measured during a computer task evaluating inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility and the number of speech disfluencies during video-recorded speech samples (story retelling and casual conversation).</p><p>Results: Two significant interactions were observed. For both inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility, we identified a significant group and inhibitory control/cognitive flexibility performance-cost interaction in stuttering-like disfluencies (SLDs), indicating that the performance-cost effects on SLD production were significantly higher in the CWS group, compared to the CWNS group.</p><p>Conclusions: CWS with reduced inhibitory control or cognitive flexibility produce more SLDs, but not other disfluencies. These results are partly in line with some previous findings in nonstuttering and stuttering populations linking inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility weaknesses to the production of speech disfluencies.</p>
dc.format.pagerange1420
dc.format.pagerange1431
dc.identifier.eissn1558-9110
dc.identifier.jour-issn1058-0360
dc.identifier.olddbid205628
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/188655
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/56171
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00242
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082790998
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorPaphiti, Maria
dc.okm.discipline3121 Internal medicineen_GB
dc.okm.discipline515 Psychologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3121 Sisätauditfi_FI
dc.okm.discipline515 Psykologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherAmerican Speech-Language-Hearing Association
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.doi10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00242
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
dc.relation.issue3
dc.relation.volume33
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/188655
dc.titleInhibitory Control, Cognitive Flexibility, and the Production of Disfluencies in Children Who Do and Do Not Stutter
dc.year.issued2024

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
AAM_ASHA_Paphiti_2024.pdf
Size:
1019.8 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format