Deliverable 3.1 Assessment of EU-level deliberative and participatory practices through an intersectional lens

dc.contributor.authorHuttunen, Janette
dc.contributor.authorKorventausta, Miikka
dc.contributor.authorLeino, Mikko
dc.contributor.authorSetälä, Maija
dc.contributor.organizationfi=valtio-oppi|en=Political Science |
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.24828550582
dc.converis.publication-id499998528
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/499998528
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-24T20:02:20Z
dc.description.abstract<p> This study develops an intersectional evaluation framework for analysing EU-level deliberative and participatory practices (DPPs) for youth engagement and applies it to 20 DPPs at the EU level. The framework is influenced by the 'Literature Review and Knowledge Integration Report' (D2.1) published as a part of SINCRONY Work Package 2 and includes four key dimensions: external inclusion, internal inclusion, intersectional purpose, and output. By using this framework as an intersectional lens, the study introduces a new approach to examining how inclusion and intersectionality measures are implemented within existing EU-level practices for political engagement. The findings indicate that the foremost way intersectionality and inclusion are promoted in EU-level DPPs is by offering support for participation. This finding suggests that the evaluated DPPs strive to empower the young participants as democratic citizens and enhance their civic skills and capabilities. The least common approaches to promoting inclusion and intersectionality were found in the intersectional purpose dimension and inclusion in recruitment. The intersectional purpose dimension entails measures such as "reclaiming the power" by the practice being youth-led or youth-initiated, and seeking institutional changes in public, political institutions, schools, or other organisations. These measures were often absent in the evaluated practices. While the results should not be considered a definitive assessment of each analysed case, the study identifies best practices that could guide the development of new DPP designs. It also provides valuable insights on aspects of inclusion and intersectionality that are generally less acknowledged, suggesting areas where future efforts could be focused to enhance inclusivity and impact. <br></p>
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/59375
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15575080
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe202601216830
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHuttunen, Janette
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKorventausta, Miikka
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLeino, Mikko
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSetälä, Maija
dc.okm.discipline517 Political scienceen_GB
dc.okm.discipline517 Valtio-oppi, hallintotiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeD4 Scientific Report
dc.titleDeliverable 3.1 Assessment of EU-level deliberative and participatory practices through an intersectional lens
dc.year.issued2024

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
D3.1. Assessment of EU practices.pdf
Size:
1.72 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format