Diagnosis of Uncomplicated and Complicated Appendicitis in Adults

dc.contributor.authorBom Wouter J.
dc.contributor.authorScheijmans Jochem C. G.
dc.contributor.authorSalminen Päivi
dc.contributor.authorBoermeester Marja A.
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.converis.publication-id57645357
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/57645357
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-27T12:24:32Z
dc.date.available2022-10-27T12:24:32Z
dc.description.abstractBackground:Diagnostic work-up of acute appendicitis remains challenging. While some guidelines advise to use a risk stratification based on clinical parameters, others use standard imaging in all patients. As non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis has been identified as feasible and safe, differentiation between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis is of paramount importance. We reviewed the literature to describe the optimal strategy for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.Methods:A narrative review about the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adult patients was conducted. Both diagnostic strategies and goals were analyzed.Results:For diagnosing acute appendicitis, both ruling in and ruling out the disease are important. Clinical and laboratory findings individually do not suffice, but when combined in a diagnostic score, a better risk prediction can be made for having acute appendicitis. However, for accurate diagnosis imaging seems obligatory in patients suspected for acute appendicitis. Scoring systems combining clinical and imaging features may differentiate between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis and may enable ruling out complicated appendicitis. Within conservatively treated patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, predictive factors for non-responsiveness to antibiotics and recurrence of appendicitis need to be defined in order to optimize treatment outcomes.Conclusion:Standard imaging increases the diagnostic power for both ruling in and ruling out acute appendicitis. Incorporating imaging features in clinical scoring models may provide better differentiation between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Optimizing patient selection for antibiotic treatment of appendicitis may minimize recurrence rates, resulting in better treatment outcomes.
dc.identifier.jour-issn1457-4969
dc.identifier.olddbid175305
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/158399
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/35902
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021093048145
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3121 Internal medicineen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3121 Sisätauditfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
dc.publisher.countryNetherlandsen_GB
dc.publisher.countryAlankomaatfi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeNL
dc.relation.articlenumberARTN 14574969211008330
dc.relation.doi10.1177/14574969211008330
dc.relation.ispartofjournalScandinavian Journal of Surgery
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/158399
dc.titleDiagnosis of Uncomplicated and Complicated Appendicitis in Adults
dc.year.issued2021

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
14574969211008330.pdf
Size:
372.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's pdf