Experiences of Intersubjectivity and Agency in Human-Horse Relationships Differ Between Box- and Open-Shed-Stable Environments

dc.contributor.authorKoski Sonja Elena
dc.contributor.authorSpännäri Jenni
dc.contributor.organizationfi=ekologia ja evoluutiobiologia|en=Ecology and Evolutionary Biology |
dc.contributor.organization-code2606402
dc.converis.publication-id387346000
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/387346000
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T23:52:59Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T23:52:59Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Human-horse relationships can be experienced in many ways and the horse companion can be given various roles, from a partner in action to a tool or commodity. How humans experience connection with horses and what kinds of roles are assigned to them may reflect or even depend on the real-life co-actions and environments. In this study, we assessed experiences of intersubjectivity in human–horse relationships, focusing particularly on whether and how agency and emotional and embodied intersubjectivity with the horse were discussed by horse owners. We conducted the study in two different stable environments, namely box stables and open-shed stables, that differ particularly in the horses’ possibilities to execute independent decision-making in their daily lives. We conducted semi-structured interviews of 25 horse owners and analyzed them using theory-guided qualitative content analysis for notions of agency and intersubjectivity. Overall, while there were only a few explicit accounts of embodied intersubjectivity in action, it was most explicitly apparent in descriptions of hacking and doing other things than riding. Additionally, intersubjectivity was apparent in descriptions of horse emotions. There were several differences in the horse owners’ accounts at the different stable environments. Respondents at the open-shed stables assigned agency more often to the horse or simultaneously themselves and the horse, discussed more often horse emotions, and emphasized hacking, playing, or just being with the horse as meaningful co-actions. At the box stables, accounts emphasizing competing, self-evidence of riding as the main activity, and human agency in co-action were more common. These results show that the management environment and forms of co-action are connected to the thoughts and views equestrians have on agency and experiences of intersubjectivity in horse–human relationships.</p>
dc.format.pagerange687
dc.format.pagerange704
dc.identifier.eissn1753-0377
dc.identifier.jour-issn0892-7936
dc.identifier.olddbid204791
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/187818
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/53482
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2024.2320999
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082786566
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKoski, Sonja
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ecology, evolutionary biologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline515 Psychologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ekologia, evoluutiobiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline515 Psykologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.doi10.1080/08927936.2024.2320999
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAnthrozoös
dc.relation.issue4
dc.relation.volume37
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/187818
dc.titleExperiences of Intersubjectivity and Agency in Human-Horse Relationships Differ Between Box- and Open-Shed-Stable Environments
dc.year.issued2024

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Experiences of Intersubjectivity and Agency in Human Horse Relationships Differ Between Box- and Open-Shed-Stable Environments.pdf
Size:
701.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format