Historical paths to shared interest in quality assurance and evaluation

dc.contributor.authorOlli Suominen
dc.contributor.authorVera Gorodski Centeno
dc.contributor.authorGalina Gurova
dc.contributor.authorJohanna Kallo
dc.contributor.authorXingguo Zhou
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kasvatustieteiden laitos|en=Department of Education|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.56860088444
dc.contributor.organization-code2604100
dc.converis.publication-id31605713
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/31605713
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T13:06:19Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T13:06:19Z
dc.description.abstract<p>This chapter explores and outlines the historical background of understanding the development of quality assurance and evaluation (QAE) policies in Brazil, China, and Russia and thus also prepares the ground for the problematics the subsequent chapters analyse. In doing this, we build largely on the previous research literature, albeit occasionally supplementing our analysis with primary documents, such as media reports, policy documents, and parallels found in our interview material. As the following chapters elucidate, although at the level of practical implementation, the countries’ experience differs markedly, at the level of political projects and rhetoric (see Chapter 6), they share a growing interest in QAE. In building the case for future chapters, our foremost task is therefore to ask how these three countries, which until recently developed separately, came to share quite similar domestic expectations and interest in QAE. Drawing on politico-socio-historical approaches, we outline the historical trajectories and antecedents of QAE policies in each national context. Our ambition to trace the socio-historical roots of the phenomenon at hand also resonates with the book’s broader framework, as uncovering the political situation is one of the three analytical dimensions of the CADEP framework the preceding chapter introduced.<br /></p>
dc.format.extent27
dc.format.pagerange44
dc.format.pagerange70
dc.identifier.eisbn978-0-203-71230-6
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-138-55973-8
dc.identifier.olddbid179730
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/162824
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/37446
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781351362528
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042719223
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSuominen, Olli
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKallo, Johanna
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorZhou, Xingguo
dc.okm.discipline516 Educational sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline516 Kasvatustieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA3 Book
dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.publisher.isbn978-1-4724;978-0-203;978-0-415;978-0-7007;978-0-7103;978-0-7146;978-1-134;978-1-135;978-1-136;978-1-138;978-1-315;978-1-317;978-1-351;978-1-84169;978-1-84872;978-1-84893;978-0-8153;978-0-429;978-0-367;978-1-003;978-1-000;978-1-032;978-0-367;978-0-429
dc.publisher.placeLontoo ja New York
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRoutledge Research in International and Comparative Education
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/162824
dc.titleHistorical paths to shared interest in quality assurance and evaluation
dc.title.bookPolitics of Quality in Education: a Comparative Study of Brazil, China, and Russia
dc.year.issued2018

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
10.4324_9780203712306-11.pdf
Size:
255.61 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format