Entangling and Elevating Creativity and Criticality in Participatory Futuring Engagements

dc.contributor.authorNicolas A. Balcom Raleigh
dc.contributor.authorSirkka Heinonen
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tulevaisuuden tutkimuskeskus|en=Finland Futures Research Centre (FFRC)|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.36987167164
dc.converis.publication-id36689812
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/36689812
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T02:23:46Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T02:23:46Z
dc.description.abstract<p>This article proposes that creativity and criticality not only can but should be entangled and elevated in participatory futuring engagements. Selected concepts from creativity theory and critical futures studies are applied to develop a set of futuring games through action research. We claim that participatory processes designed to entangle and elevate creativity and criticality produce more novel and varied ideas that better fit the purposes of futures studies. This article offers four arguments for combining creativity and criticality in participatory futuring engagements. First, due to complexity and uncertainty, the future is ultimately unknowable and requires tools to probe the unknown. Second, novelty is difficult to achieve in practice while creativity and criticality can help overcome these challenges. Third, discontinuities are the main sources of futures that are most radically different from the present and will have the biggest impact. Fourth, creativity and criticality support the rigorous imagining required for exploring and discovering new possible futures. This article analyzes three experimentations in entangling and elevating creativity and criticality in game-based futuring, stemming from Causal Layered Analysis. Based on these examples, we demonstrate that creativity and criticality, when combined, help people break through the limitations of current understanding, reveal approaching tipping points, and find the “unvisited cavities” through rhizomatic knowledge creation. However, there remain challenges in evaluating how well various participatory designs support creativity and criticality in practice. Context-sensitive evaluation tools and open sharing of outcomes are needed to develop participation design principles capable of supporting creativity and criticality in participatory futuring.</p>
dc.identifier.eissn2169-2793
dc.identifier.jour-issn1946-7567
dc.identifier.olddbid209038
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/192065
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/38428
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1946756718807014
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042720188
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorBalcom Raleigh, Nicolas
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHeinonen, Sirkka
dc.okm.discipline5141 Sociologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline520 Other social sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline5141 Sosiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline520 Muut yhteiskuntatieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherSage
dc.relation.doi10.1177/1946756718807014
dc.relation.ispartofjournalWorld Futures Review
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/192065
dc.titleEntangling and Elevating Creativity and Criticality in Participatory Futuring Engagements
dc.year.issued2018

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Balcom Raleigh & Heinonen 2018 E&E C&C CCBYNC4.pdf
Size:
196.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format