Intensity of artefacts in cone beam CT examinations caused by titanium and glass fibre-reinforced composite implants

dc.contributor.authorNiina Kuusisto
dc.contributor.authorSisko Huumonen
dc.contributor.authorAntti Kotiaho
dc.contributor.authorMarianne Haapea
dc.contributor.authorJami Rekola
dc.contributor.authorPekka Vallittu
dc.contributor.organizationfi=korva-, nenä-, ja kurkkutautioppi|en=Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.64787032594
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.93326749889
dc.converis.publication-id37423972
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/37423972
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-27T11:56:29Z
dc.date.available2022-10-27T11:56:29Z
dc.description.abstractObjectives:<br />The aim was to compare titanium and glass fibre-reinforced composite (FRC) orbital floor implants using cone beam CT (CBCT). FRC implants are nonmetallic and these implants have not been analysed in CBCT images before. The purpose of this study is to compare the artefact formation of the titanium and the FRC orbital floor implants in CBCT images.<br />Methods:<br />One commercially pure titanium and one S-glass FRC with bioactive glass particles implant were imaged with CBCT using the same imaging values (80 kV, 1 mA, FOV 60 × 60 mm). CBCT images were analysed in axial slices from three areas to determine the magnitude of the artefacts in the vicinity of the implants. Quantified results based on the gray values of images were analysed using analysis-of-variance.<br />Results:<br />Compared to the reference the gray values of the titanium implant are more negative in every region of interest in all slices (p < 0.05) whereas the gray values of the FRC implant differ statistically significantly in less than half of the examined areas.<br />Conclusions:<br />The titanium implant caused artefacts in all of the analysed CBCT slices. Compared to the reference the gray values of the FRC implant changed only slightly and this feature enables to use wider imaging options postoperatively.
dc.identifier.eissn1476-542X
dc.identifier.jour-issn0250-832X
dc.identifier.olddbid172962
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/156056
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/30755
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042720585
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKuusisto, Niina
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHuumonen, Sisko
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorRekola, Jami
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorVallittu, Pekka
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline313 Dentistryen_GB
dc.okm.discipline313 Hammaslääketieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherBritish Institute of Radiology
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.1259/dmfr.20170471
dc.relation.ispartofjournalDentomaxillofacial Radiology
dc.relation.issue2
dc.relation.volume48
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/156056
dc.titleIntensity of artefacts in cone beam CT examinations caused by titanium and glass fibre-reinforced composite implants
dc.year.issued2019

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
18.5.dmfr.20170471.pdf
Size:
488.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's PDF