Testing storage methods of faecal samples for subsequent measurement of helminth egg numbers in the domestic horse

dc.contributor.authorJennie A.H. Crawley
dc.contributor.authorSimon N. Chapman
dc.contributor.authorVirpi Lummaa
dc.contributor.authorCarly L. Lynsdale
dc.contributor.organizationfi=ekologia ja evoluutiobiologia|en=Ecology and Evolutionary Biology |
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.20415010352
dc.converis.publication-id18449230
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/18449230
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-27T11:48:49Z
dc.date.available2022-10-27T11:48:49Z
dc.description.abstractParasite infection status, intensity and resistance have traditionally been quantified via flotation techniques, but the need for immediate analysis following defecation imposes limitations and has led to the use of several faecal storage techniques. However, their effect on nematode egg counts has not been systematically validated and is often generalised across taxa despite evidence of differences between species. Here, we take the domestic horse Equus ferus caballus as a model to examine the impact of commonly used storage techniques on egg recovery: 1) high and low concentrations of ethanol and formalin fixative solutions for up to four weeks and 2) refrigeration (3-5 degrees C) over a two-week period. We found a significant decline in faecal egg counts (FEC) following storage in high and low concentrations of both fixative solutions after two weeks, which stabilised after four weeks, and this pattern was uniform across replicates. FECs remained relatively stable over a week of refrigeration, but declined when refrigeration exceeded 8 days. Prior to FEC analysis, we recommend sample refrigeration for no more than one week. Storage in either fixative solution is sub-optimal for the preservation of nematode eggs, although the uniformity of the decline across samples could hold potential for projective calculation of parasite egg shedding when storage time is effectively controlled for. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
dc.format.pagerange130
dc.format.pagerange133
dc.identifier.jour-issn0304-4017
dc.identifier.olddbid172024
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/155118
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/29692
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401716300656?via=ihub
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042716348
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLummaa, Virpi
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ecology, evolutionary biologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ekologia, evoluutiobiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.03.012
dc.relation.ispartofjournalVeterinary Parasitology
dc.relation.volume221
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/155118
dc.titleTesting storage methods of faecal samples for subsequent measurement of helminth egg numbers in the domestic horse
dc.year.issued2016

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
1-s2.0-S0304401716300656-main.pdf
Size:
417.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's PDF